Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chrisnj

What happened to the request? Did the GOP oppose it then?


3 posted on 12/22/2012 5:26:55 AM PST by corlorde (forWARD of the state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: corlorde
From the article at the link: "Already, it has placed 2,200 officers in more than 1,000 communities across our nation, where they are heightening school safety as well as coaching sports and acting as mentors and mediators for kids in need," Clinton said.

So apparently the program was well underway when he asked for more money.

11 posted on 12/22/2012 5:42:00 AM PST by FairWitness (Everything is easy, once you've done it once)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: corlorde

Well, they did point out that Clinton ignored the cultural problems of violent video games and violent movies, because he took campaign cash from Hollywood.

Note that the request Brietbart made wasn’t an initial request, it was additional spending — they had already spent money putting cops in schools before this request.

I don’t think cops in schools IS the long-term solution. The NRA seemed to suggest it as a short-term fix while the schools put in place programs to arm other people.

I think cops in schools are a bad idea. Most of the time they would have nothing to do — unless we fire someone in each school and give their job to the police officer, who no doubt could be trained to teach, or be an administrative assistant, or a janitor.

And I disagree that we need an interim solution, because frankly, kids rarely get killed in school. 500 kids a year are killed accidentally by guns, for example.

58 children age 5-9 were murdered by guns in 2010 that is about half the murders — of the other 53 murders, 13 were unspecified.

But 385 children ages 1-4 were murdered in 2010. And of those, 163 were “unclassified”, and only 43 were by gun.

There just aren’t enough kids killed in schools to make it cost-effective. We’d be protecting some of the safest places in the country (albeit the places most likely to have mass murder).

Now, if you can figure out where the mass murders will take place, you could target police and increase the cost-effectiveness. Good luck with that in this environment. These murders mostly take place in rich white schools, because that what generates the most media attention, the people in those areas are the ones with the most disposable income and therefore spend the most time playing violent video games and watching violent movies.

See, if you look at who commits these murders, and where they happen, it will point the finger at the “wrong” people.

Anyway, by focusing police on schools, we remove focus from all the other places where a mass murderer might attack.


13 posted on 12/22/2012 5:54:55 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson