If we HAVE to get involved? WHy do we HAVE to get involved? I couldn’t care less which side wins there. Well, actually thats not true. Assad would be better than the Al Qeida Moslem Brotherhood rebels.
I cannot believe anyone wants to risk a war with Russia, so we can join in on the side of Al Qeida. Is there any war we cannot find an excuse to get involved in?
posted on 12/24/2012 9:49:16 AM PST
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
This is another one of those conflicts that we should amass troops at the Mexican border to deal with, and then leave them there.
Interestingly , the same left that hated LBJ (& loved Communists) and drove him from office for operating within our treaty with the legal government of South Vietnam, is the left that loves Obama's illegally sending US troops to fight and die for the Muslim Brotherhood Al-Queda terrorists building the World Caliphate.
Wouldn't want any Muslims to die when we can kill Christians with US assets.
posted on 12/24/2012 10:08:26 AM PST
by Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
Your questions are valid as well as very serious in nature, and I do share your sentiments. At least with Assad's military state in command there was some resemblance of partial peace in the area. Now things may get totally out of hand.
posted on 12/24/2012 2:51:01 PM PST
(I'm going John Galt.... But. Honor must be earned.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson