Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ordinary folks losing faith in stocks
Associated Press ^ | Dec. 27, 2012 5:17 PM EST | Bernard Condon

Posted on 12/27/2012 11:54:32 PM PST by Olog-hai

Andrew Neitlich is the last person you’d expect to be rattled by the stock market. He once worked as a financial analyst picking stocks for a mutual fund. He has huddled with dozens of CEOs in his current career as an executive coach. During the dot-com crash 12 years ago, he kept his wits and did not sell. But he’s selling now. “You have to trust your government. You have to trust other governments. You have to trust Wall Street,” says Neitlich, 47. “And I don’t trust any of these.”

Defying decades of investment history, ordinary Americans are selling stocks for a fifth year in a row. The selling has not let up despite unprecedented measures by the Federal Reserve to persuade people to buy and the come-hither allure of a levitating market. Stock prices have doubled from March 2009, their low point during the Great Recession. …

Since they started selling in April 2007, eight months before the start of the Great Recession, individual investors have pulled at least $380 billion from U.S. stock funds, a category that includes both mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, according to estimates by the AP. That is the equivalent of all the money they put into the market in the previous five years. Instead of stocks, they’re putting money into bonds because those are widely perceived as safer investments. Individuals have put more than $1 trillion into bond mutual funds alone since April 2007, according to the Investment Company Institute, a trade group representing investment funds. …

(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

The Fed reduces Goldman Sacks cash reserve requirement and in turn Goldman Sacks buys stocks and put them in inventory.


21 posted on 12/28/2012 5:04:07 AM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
Please explain to me why the dow remains over 13K ?


22 posted on 12/28/2012 5:19:04 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
Every time two fiat dollars are added to the money supply, the theoretical value of an existing dollar already in circulation is cut in half.

Not half (unless there were exactly two dollars in circulation to begin with). More like 100*(1-N/(N+2))%, where N is the number of dollars in circulation initially.

23 posted on 12/28/2012 5:29:37 AM PST by Darth Reardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Great post but I have a question.

I understand that money gets printed and added to the supply of money but exactly how does the Federal Reserve put money directly into the stock market?

(I’ve heard people talk about the plunge protection team etc...)

Thanks.


24 posted on 12/28/2012 5:31:04 AM PST by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter
Much of the overt part of the Fed investmeents are in the financial markets, rather than directly into the stock market. This has come in the form of Federal Reserve purchases of Treasury debt instruments, something like $600 billion in QE2. QE Infinite is following similar approaches.

What has some people concerned are the activities of the Plunge Protection Team with its direct intervention into the futures markets for stocks. The Fed and Obama Administration have widely announced how they are using the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to prop up the stock market as a means of executing fiscal policies. What is hard to know are the sweetheart deals being made secretly which leverages these Fed asset purchases and TARP asset management to perhaps unlawfully manipulate the stock market and individual stocks despite Federal law.

http://articles.marketwatch.com/2010-09-24/investing/30800018_1_fund-managers-fund-firm-capital-markets

http://articles.marketwatch.com/2010-01-05/commentary/30808959_1_stock-market-trimtabs-investment-research-fed-chairman

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fund-flows-firm-suggests-government-bought-stocks-2010-01-05

http://www.morgangold.com/news/20121003-fed-using-monetary-policy-to-prop-up-stock-market-as-recession-looms.html

Fed Memo Reveals Action to Prop Up Market
Big Brother has his finger in the stock market pie, regardless of laws and regulations.
By Martin Mann

http://www.libertylobby.org/articles/1997/19971124fed_market_prop.html

25 posted on 12/28/2012 5:52:07 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: t1b8zs

I won’t owe any taxes: It’s gone down in twelve years.


26 posted on 12/28/2012 6:24:00 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (If you're FOR sticking scissors in a baby girl's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: central_va
pay off all debt

I disagree. If hyperinflation is indeed looming, then holding on to a fixed interest debt (i.e. mortgage, auto loans, etc.) is advantageous. If the dollar devalues 50%, then your fixed debt has, in effect been reduced by 50%. Why would I want to pay off a loan in today's dollars when I can pay much less in tomorrow's dollars?

27 posted on 12/28/2012 6:48:01 AM PST by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

All part of the plan to get us to happily sign over our 401K’s to Theresa Ghilarducci’s Great National Pension Scheme when it is proposed.


28 posted on 12/28/2012 7:10:57 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
This article uses too many religious overtones and attributes them to the stock market and the government.

religious overtones? The article used 'gospel' once, and cult a few times. They clearly are used in a metaphorical sense, not a theological one. And it was 'gospel of investing' and 'cult of equities', so they were in reference to Wall Street, not the government.

I'm also sure the 'swinging for the fences' comment did not refer to anything going on at Yankee Stadium.

You might as well hang up your rhetorical spurs if you can't handle such metaphors.

In any case, this an AP story, short on facts and long on interpretation. The whole point is summed up in the fact that fewer folks trust our government or other governments, and almost nobody trusts Wall Street.

29 posted on 12/28/2012 10:26:03 AM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhandluke

Too many metaphors is too many metaphors. Never mind the shadow of Mammon worship going on there. I reserve my right to take umbrage at such metaphors in any case and care not for who finds it odious or otherwise troubling.

Are you actually defending the liberal media? I hope I am mistaken.


30 posted on 12/28/2012 10:34:39 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Shane; WhiskeyX

Excellent sumation except for the it’s wrong part. The S&P has a historical P/E ratio of about 15.5. It’s at 16 now. The market isn’t overvalued.


31 posted on 12/28/2012 2:30:21 PM PST by newbie 10-21-00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newbie 10-21-00

Look closely at the S&P 500 PE chart back to 1917.

http://www.multpl.com/

Notice how the ratio peaked at 123.79 in May 2009. This means the PE ratio was skyrocketing in the period May 2007 through January 2009. at the same time as individual share prices plummeted and the market lost a major fraction of its average per share price level. In other words, the price earnings ratio is not necessarily by itself an indicator for an impending Bear market or market panic and crash. in that period the crash was due to a economy wide credit and liquidity crisis.


32 posted on 12/28/2012 9:02:32 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Mammon worship? It's hard to do business if you can't talk about it.

Defending the liberal media? Nope, just arguing that an AP article that uses the word 'cult' isn't really talking about religion, just using a metaphor for some people not really thinking it through about equities.

There really isn't a 'cult of equities', the AP writer has it quite wrong. The folks he was talking about are the Wall Street equities brokers, whose job it is to sell equities, so of course it looks like they aren't thinking it through. They are simply lying through their teeth about how equities always being the right choice.

You get to take as much umbrage as you want. I'm just pointing out that you have crossed the silly line in this case, IMHO.

33 posted on 12/29/2012 7:41:25 AM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: slowhandluke

There is a difference between doing business and Mammon worship. And it’s not like I agree with the AP’s assessment besides, so I think we’re on the same page there.


34 posted on 12/29/2012 7:52:32 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson