Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australian DJs behind royal hospital hoax phone call 'will not face charges', police say
The Daily Mail Online ^ | December 28, 2012 | Frank Thorne

Posted on 12/28/2012 7:21:15 AM PST by Uncle Chip

The two Australian DJs whose hoax phone call has been blamed for the death of a nurse at a hospital which treated Kate Middleton for morning sickness are unlikely to face any charges.


It was originally thought the two hosts could face prosecution but yesterday Sydney police said no request had been made by detectives in the UK suggesting no further action would be taken.

New South Wales Deputy Police Commissioner Nick Kaldas said yesterday: 'Nor do we expect there to be any requests.'

Mr Kaldas said Scotland Yard had not asked for any further information or to interview the two Sydney-based hosts.


Since her death, it has been revealed Ms Saldanha had attempted to kill herself twice in the past year and had been prescribed anti-depressants.

Officers submitted a file to the CPS last week for it to consider whether any offences may have been committed by making the hoax call.

But senior police in Australia believe British prosecutors would have difficulty in finding a charge that could be laid against the two DJs.


Since the nurse's death, the pair have been subjected to hate mail and death threats forcing them to go into hiding.

Apart from a TV interview in the days after the suicide, the two have not been seen in public.

They made a tearful apology and their radio station has pledged at least $500,000 - about £320,000 - to help the dead nurse's family.

A London inquest heard earlier this month that Ms Saldanha had been found in staff accommodation and there were no suspicious circumstances over her death. Ms Saldanha left three notes, in one of which she criticised the DJs.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: australiandjs
One wonders how long they were going to keep her preexisting medical condition under wraps.
1 posted on 12/28/2012 7:21:21 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

That’s why the law insists that in such cases, all parties agree to the broadcast. The nurse would have undoubtedly not agreed to the broadcast had she been contacted.

2 posted on 12/28/2012 7:27:36 AM PST by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

This reminds me of the Dixie Chicks. Sure, you can say something stupid on the radio to get attention. But don’t be totally surprised if you get it, and it ruins your career.

3 posted on 12/28/2012 7:54:42 AM PST by Casie (Chuck Norris 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

eggshell skull principle.

you take your victim as you find them.

It is no different than yelling “boo” to a person with a weak heart.

The fact she had previous issues does not change their liablity. This should have gone to a jury and let the jury decide. The previous attempts are irrelivant to their liability.

One hopes the family sues civiliy.

4 posted on 12/28/2012 8:02:14 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! and
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Of course they won’t be charged, they are sick freaks who think the media is above the law. I hope someone gives them a face pounding.

5 posted on 12/28/2012 8:18:04 AM PST by GeronL (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson