Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/28/2012 10:11:06 AM PST by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: the scotsman

I hope this is not true. Reduces my respect for Reagan.
On the bright side, he followed up with real support as an ally ought to.


2 posted on 12/28/2012 10:16:26 AM PST by Little Ray (Get back to work. Your urban masters need their EBTs refilled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

Dang. Ronald Reagan’s hero status with me just came off.


3 posted on 12/28/2012 10:20:39 AM PST by MeganC (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

Having some personal knowledge on what lengths the Reagan Administration went to support the British efforts in the Falklands, this “reporting” doesn’t change how I feel about Ronald Reagan as a great President.


10 posted on 12/28/2012 10:31:27 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

I bet that was a disinformation plant story.

psy-ops, to conceal truth.

nobody would have believed it then and nobody believes it now.

(except John Kerry, he believes anything)


11 posted on 12/28/2012 10:32:22 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

Even though it has a liberal hag as the star, I strongly suggest “The Iron Lady.” I suspect the liberal idiots behind the move thought the audience would be aghast at her unbending will on the issues.

For me the only thought was, “DAMM could we use somebody like that now”!!!!!!!!!!!!!


13 posted on 12/28/2012 10:34:30 AM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

Let’s keep in mind a context of the times. Argentine was actually an allay of America’s also. America has a special duty to ensure peace reigns in this hemisphere. I think that Reagan was trying to allow Argentina to save some face because if they didn’t the government could fall, chaos and the unknown would ensue. Then who knows what happens in Argentina. Possible communism? As it happened, the government did fall but they didn’t turn to Russia.

As for Britian going it alone as it is said in the article. That’s not entirely true. Reagan cut off arms sales to Argentina, approved the use of our LPH’s for backup in case they lost an aircraft carrier and we sold them missiles and other military equipment.


14 posted on 12/28/2012 10:34:30 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman; All

Reagan did have some extreme Globalists in his admin like Bush and Baker...who were also neo Hispano-Racist....Note the Falkland Is. are the Argos. version of Aztlan-Reconquista

I am more impressed with Thatcher than disappointed with Reagan


15 posted on 12/28/2012 10:35:27 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (Fiscal Conservatives are Neither)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

Something’s not right with this. We were helping the Brits, but we didn’t make it known.

And with the Brits so close to the Falklands at the time it makes no sense for Reagan to have asked Thatcher to back-off and “give peace a chance”.

Sorry. This is BS.


28 posted on 12/28/2012 11:16:22 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Bathhouse Barry wants YOU to bend over for another four years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

Here’s where U.K. hypocrisy shows itself, today.

They can continue to claim legitimacy for their OCCUPATION of a colonial possesion thousands of mile away, while belittling little Israel for defending the defensible borders it has come to have in defense against the many threats to its existence.


29 posted on 12/28/2012 11:18:57 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

Anybody really look up which navy burned down Puerto Soledad and bannished the priates raiding US clipper ships going round the cape to California ? Which by the way enabled the Brits to re-settle the chain.

Reagan offered a lot of important back channel stuff to the Brits. Who might know where the Belasario was and where it was going ? There was and still is a lot going on in South America at that time. If he did suggest this he already knew what their answer would be


43 posted on 12/28/2012 1:02:46 PM PST by mosesdapoet ("A voice crying in the wilderness make streight for the way of the Lord")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

A President putting his country’s diplomatic interests first...

Reagan must be condemned for that LOL!


46 posted on 12/28/2012 1:58:45 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman
Maybe because the Argies actually did something with their native communists, namely kill them.

The Brits have no place in the western hemisphere. Remember the Monroe Doctrine.

53 posted on 12/28/2012 3:48:14 PM PST by Clemenza ("History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil governm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson