Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s not smart to build your warships like tinderboxes. It’s not that the exocet is such a miracle tool.


6 posted on 12/29/2012 12:32:14 AM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hardraade

“It’s not smart to build your warships like tinderboxes.”
If I recall the rationale, they built them that way because they were not expected to survive a war with the Soviets. The Soviets would use nukes and heavy armor wouldn’t help. Therefore, why not build them faster, lighter, and able to deliver a significant punch before they got hit? Then, as with everything military, they got used in a different conflict environment than they were intended for.

I’m certain that there are other calculations involved as well. For example, how much more money would it take to armor and operate an armored ship with no aluminum? How many more lightly built ships could you build with cheaper material? Then, there’s politics, I’m sure aluminum suppliers were big spenders on the campaign trail and offered jobs to retiring well-placed procurement types. The safety of the crew is probably WAY down the list of considerations.


9 posted on 12/29/2012 4:55:12 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson