Posted on 12/29/2012 11:20:37 AM PST by John S Mosby
Happy New Year.
Some of us conservatives are pretty nervous right about now with Obama, Newtown, and Boehner and McConnell’s antics.
Freakin’ granola-chomping nutballs.
What happens, happens.
What happens, happens.
My opinion is that any conservative who is still using Facebook is a fool.
By Abhijeet Singh
Colonial Roots of Gun-Control
I live in India and I am a proud firearm owner - but I am the exception not the norm, an odd situation in a country with a proud martial heritage and a long history of firearm innovation. This is not because the people of India are averse to gun ownership, but instead due to Draconian anti-gun legislation going back to colonial times.
To trace the roots of India's anti-gun legislation we need to step back to the latter half of the 19th century. The British had recently fought off a major Indian rebellion (the mutiny of 1857) and were busy putting in place measures to ensure that the events of 1857 were never repeated. These measures included a major restructuring of administration and the colonial British Indian Army along with improvements in communications and transportation. Meanwhile the Indian masses were systematically being disarmed and the means of local firearm production destroyed, to ensure that they (the Indian masses) would never again have the means to rise in rebellion against their colonial masters. Towards this end the colonial government, under Lord Lytton as Viceroy (1874 -1880), brought into existence the Indian Arms Act, 1878 (11 of 1878); an act which, exempted Europeans and ensured that no Indian could possess a weapon of any description unless the British masters considered him a "loyal" subject of the British Empire.
An example of British thinking in colonial times: "No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion." --James Burgh (Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses) [London, 1774-1775]
And thoughts (on this subject) of the man who wanted to rule the world: "The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed the subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty." -- Adolf Hitler (H.R. Trevor-Roper, Hitler's Table Talks 1941-1944)
The leaders of our freedom struggle recognised this, even Gandhi the foremost practitioner of passive resistance and non-violence had this to say about the British policy of gun-control in India: "Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." -- Mahatma Gandhi (An Autobiography OR The story of my experiments with truth, by M.K. Gandhi, p.238)
OK, no problem with that. Purpose in posting was directed at FB which IS a cash machine for obamaomau and company. The hypocrisy of FB is laughable in the case of a Ghandi quote— whether about an absent Indian Army or personal firearm ownership. It really cranked their chain.
From a TEA party perspective there is a spectrum of “conservatives to be” in the “local food” movement— in the sense of small “organic” companies vs. big govt. meddlers in our food (the obamaomau agriculture dept, the EPA and others are NOT the friend of what remains of small productive farms, for example).
This is a hard lesson in conservatism, small govt. and freedom, but once they experience the tyranny, they never go back— and they are organized, and now are “clingers” of many persuasions religion wise. It is fascinating to see, and where possible to cultivate (pun intended!).
Deo Vindice.
Funny, this FB page is still up and going strong:
http://www.facebook.com/nagrfb
Maybe the issue has more to do with Natural News and Infowars and less with the 2nd Amendment?
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.