Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Work Then and It Won’t Work Now
Townhall.com ^ | December 30, 2012 | Doug Giles

Posted on 12/29/2012 10:33:13 PM PST by Kaslin

Senator Dianne Feinstein is queuing up come January 2013 to retable—yet again—an Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) in order to “severely mitigate the possibilities of another Sandy Hook atrocity.” Great idea, Dianne, as the first AWB that Clinton signed into law worked wonders in schools from 1994-2004. It was awesome. It panned out wonderfully aside from the following:

And that’s excluding the Fairchild Air Force Base Massacre in 1994; the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building Massacre in 1995; the Caltrans Maintenance Yard Massacre in 1997; the Connecticut State Lottery Headquarters Massacre in 1998; the Wedgewood Baptist Church Massacre of 1999; the Xerox Office Building Massacre in 1999; the Edgewater Technology Office Massacre in 2000; and the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks which killed nearly 3,000 people (in which the culprits used box cutters and airplanes to pull that one off). We should have had an Assault Box Cutter and Airplane Ban in place I guess.

Yep, excluding the aforementioned, the AWB that the Left put into practice nearly two decades ago really mitigated murderous schoolyard and workplace evil for its ten-year run, right?

Ah, who am I kidding? The Assault Weapons Ban didn't work. School shootings shot through the roof, and lo and behold killers still found a way around the uber-strict regulations to carry out their death wishes with an assortment of weapons. Yep, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe the biggest spike in school shootings in our nation’s short history occurred during the initial AWB. Google it and get back to me.

Oh, and another thing according to a comprehensive Congressional Research Service report on guns and gun control legislation: Less than 2% of 203,300 state and federal prisoners who were armed during the crime for which they were incarcerated “used, carried, or possessed a semiautomatic assault weapon.” If the hooligans did use a gun it was mostly your normal, non-funky firearm, i.e. mostly hunting guns and non-"assault" weapons. But we can rest assured that the Progressives would never come after our Remington 870s and our revolvers (because they promised). Never. Ever. Ever.

In addition to the AWB not really stemming the tide of gun violence in the public school systems, it sure didn’t calm things down in the “gun-free” Windy City, as Chi-town racked up a whopping 7,636 murders during the Clinton ban.

Speaking of Chicago, this year alone 446 kids have been shot where guns have been verboten, and just this week Chicago hit 500 murders that have now occurred in the “gun free” Toddlin’ Town for 2012.

It appears as if our former AWB and our current “gun free” zones don’t work.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 2012; assaultweaponsban; banglist; guncontrol; guns; newtown; nocompromise; secondamendment; shooting; wewillnotcompy; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Kaslin

There’s lots of interesting facts about guns here:
http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/publications/by-type/yearbook/small-arms-survey-2012.html

The amount of “illegal” guns in the gun-free paradise of the EU is greater than the legally held guns. People are just ignoring them and keeping their guns.


21 posted on 12/30/2012 7:07:08 AM PST by dljordan (Voltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

That is exactly where they are going, ban all guns. What bothers me with commentary about how the assault weapons ban did not work is the left will use that as a basis for why they need to much further this time....ban all weapons or as close to it as they can get with a previso they enact registration of guns and gun owners of those remaining in public hands.


22 posted on 12/30/2012 7:54:16 AM PST by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What you aren’t considering is that violence was invented by the chinese when they invented gunpowder. There was never any violence before then. </sarcasm>
In reality, of course, firearms were developed to solve the problem of non-firearm violence. Non-firearm violence, of course, is harder by an order of magnitude and, in the absence of firearms, that fact naturally lends itself to domination by violent elites such as knights and noblemen.
Disarmament of the individual is sine qua non for unlimited tyranny.
To disarm in principle is to trust absolutely. Trusting someone who demands, rather than earns, trust is folly. Disarming in principle is yielding the very right to withdraw trust.
The Wind and the Sun

An Aesop Fable

The wind and the sun argued one day over which one was the stronger. Spotting a man man traveling on the road, they sported a challenge to see which one could remove the coat from the man's back the quickest.

The wind began. He blew strong gusts of air, so strong that the man could barely walk against them. But the man clutched his coat tight against him. The wind blew harder and longer, and the harder the wind blew, the tighter the man held his coat against him.The wind blew until he was exhausted, but he could not remove the coat from the man's back.

It was now the sun's turn. He gently sent his beams upon the traveler. The sun did very little, but quietly shone upon his head and back until the man became so warm that he took off his coat and headed for the nearest shade tree.

The gun controller actually promotes the thing which he purports to oppose. At least, so the reports of lines at gun stores indicate.
Gun ownership is a burden, and as such it is an indication of lack of trust. The government should exert itself to prevent the motive for, and not the access to, weapons. But that would mean doing the government’s job of controlling the power of the sword, and protecting the rights of the people. What fun would that be? </sarcasm>

23 posted on 12/30/2012 10:23:18 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

(A significant number of background checks cover multiple gun sales.)

24 posted on 12/30/2012 10:46:17 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson