Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Judge England" and the upcoming "Eligibility Challenge" of Illegal-Alien Barack Obama
Orly Taitz Press Release ^ | 12-31-12 | Edward C. Noonan

Posted on 12/31/2012 6:47:47 PM PST by ednoonan7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: Larry - Moe and Curly

Already talked about it.


61 posted on 01/03/2013 3:04:04 PM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Winston
"Wong Kim Ark."

Quote from the case, where they found him to be a "natural Born Citizen."

62 posted on 01/03/2013 4:03:18 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Winston
Who wrote that opinion? James C. Ho did, "Taiwanese by birth and Texan by marriage."
It would be interesting to find out if his kids where born prior to him obtaining his citizenship.

In any event, he is also on the Advisory Committe to a group called "Americans for Constitutional Citizenship," which advocates, among other things, that children born in the U.S. to illegal alien parents should be considered citizens of the U.S. That is in direct contradiction to the original meaning and intent of those who created and passed the 14th Amendment.

He also wrote an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, again advocating for citizenship status for the children born here to those who violated our immigration laws to get here.

He's also on the Advisory Council for a group called "ImmigrationWorks USA" which states, in part, that they want to counter what they call the "restrictionist right." It appears that they are more concerned with finding jobs in the US for foreigners, than for citizens.

Back in 2008, he even wrote an article titled: "Let’s abolish unjust barrier to presidency" (a pdf of the original newspaper article) in which he argues that the "natural Born Citizen" requirement for president is "unfair, if not un-American."

Etc.

The guy is clearly anti-natural Born Citizen Constitutional requirement, and his opinions show it.

63 posted on 01/03/2013 4:44:57 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Winston

“Already talked about it.”

Oh, right. Wong Kim Ark. You’re one of THOSE after-birthers.


64 posted on 01/03/2013 6:10:49 PM PST by Larry - Moe and Curly (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Larry - Moe and Curly

Not really. I’m just someone who actually respects the Constitution, instead of just saying I do, and who took what the birthers were saying seriously enough to read stuff like that court case and see whether what they were saying made sense. And who also understands that literally no one who matters (including people like Mark Levin) has said there’s any reason to give any credence to all the birther stuff.

Which is actually about as relevant at this point as all the folks who said George W Bush plotted 9/11.


65 posted on 01/03/2013 7:18:10 PM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson