The only constitutional issue here has already been evaluated on its merits. A person born a US citizen in the United States is a natural born citizen without regard to the citizenship of his or her parents. That was settled by the US Supreme Court in 1898, more than a century ago. That is well-settled law. And that is why the current US Supreme Court has repeatedly turned down birther lawsuits without comment. They don’t think it’s even worth commenting on.
What SCOTUS case, ever, stated that simply being born in U.S. jurisdiction and regardless of parental citizenship makes one a “nautral Born Citizen?”
“That was settled by the US Supreme Court in 1898, more than a century ago. “
Jeff - what case(s) are you referring to?