Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama, Senate Republicans reach agreement on ‘fiscal cliff’ (All taxes, no cuts)
The Washington Post ^ | DECEMBER 31, 11:01 PM ET | By Lori Montgomery and Paul Kane,

Posted on 12/31/2012 9:32:12 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: tennmountainman

Taxes have already gone up. The Pubs are stuck with the choice between increased taxes for 5% or the public, or higher taxes for everyone who pays taxes. If they don’t agree, they will never be able to convince the average taxpayer that they are the party of low taxes for everyone. That would play into the RATS meme that the Pubs only care about the rich, and kill the Pub brand as the party of low taxes forever.

Sometimes it sucks, but you have to fold a losing hand.


61 posted on 01/01/2013 2:45:43 AM PST by Hugin ("Most times a man'll tell you his bad intentions, if you listen and let yourself hear."---Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

It looks that way now, but they were gambling there would be a Pub president and Senate now. If there was it would look like a brilliant strategy. As it is, we’re screwed. I can’t see any way to win this one.


62 posted on 01/01/2013 2:53:39 AM PST by Hugin ("Most times a man'll tell you his bad intentions, if you listen and let yourself hear."---Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Varsity Flight
Well as usual, the bastards wait until the world is asleep and like thieves in the night sign a bill that once again screws the tax payers and doesn't come near to any real cost reductions. All we can hope for is the CONGRESS does NOT support the obvious demodummie senate majority.

The thieves all need to be replaced, not just part of the from time to time.

63 posted on 01/01/2013 4:56:06 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Varsity Flight
Well as usual, the bastards wait until the world is asleep and like thieves in the night sign a bill that once again screws the tax payers and doesn't come near to any real cost reductions. All we can hope for is the CONGRESS does NOT support the obvious demodummie senate majority.

The thieves all need to be replaced asap, not just part of them from time to time.

64 posted on 01/01/2013 4:57:29 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Varsity Flight

Well as usual, the bastards wait until the world is asleep and like thieves in the night sign a bill that once again screws the tax payers and doesn’t come near to any real cost reductions. All we can hope for is the CONGRESS does NOT support the obvious demodummie senate majority.

The thieves all need to be replaced, not just part of them from time to time.


65 posted on 01/01/2013 4:58:13 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

“Now, let us debate about how much the top “1%” should pay. And solve the fiscal imbalance.”

How much you say they should pay? Not one percent more than any other economic group.

All should pay (lets say) 10%. Then everyone pays their “fair share” ... period.

You either represent all the people (in your district/state) or you represent none of them. Singling out any group is un-American and is the politics of division ... not the American way.

This “agreement” is a digrace and Republicans will pay for it in the end.

Next, will they single out gun owners for harsh treatment, further dividing the American people?


66 posted on 01/01/2013 5:34:02 AM PST by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Don’t these extra constitutional acts make all you Republicans just button busting proud?


67 posted on 01/01/2013 5:34:39 AM PST by Tupelo (I'm an old man and most people hate me,but that' s OK because I do not like them either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

It is irrelevant. Unless you close the loopholes the person making 400k will still be able to write off enough where the increase will not matter.

The less you make, the less opportunity you have to write it off. They always knew the number. That’s why there s a tax lobby. This was symbolic to give Obama a win.


68 posted on 01/01/2013 6:04:13 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (You can't bring something to its knees that refuses to stand on its own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Did you say Physical Cliff? Last light on Diana's Throne 12/31/2012


69 posted on 01/01/2013 6:36:25 AM PST by Utah Binger (Southern Utah where the world comes to see America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
“Bush” Tax cuts made permanent on 99%+ of Americans. AMT fix permanent. Death tax reduced and permanent (another day to fight to make it zero). Huge GOP victory in my mind.

Even better, it takes away the only thing Obama has in his quiver - raising taxes on high-earners. It's been his "solution" for everything. Now it's done. When the deficit remains at $1T he won't have anything to offer. His lack of clothing will be apparent for all to see. The scales will fall from a few peoples' eyes each day. By 2014 he will be Jimmy Carter II, with no one caring what he says.

70 posted on 01/01/2013 7:29:34 AM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I understand your point of view on Palin & Ryan. But will you accede that they would have had much more power to affect conservative agenda had they won the election as VP’s?


71 posted on 01/01/2013 10:55:08 AM PST by entropy12 (The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

In my fantasy world, I want only pure conservatives to run for office. In my real world, I will accept any republican who can actually win in elections, over any democrap. It comes from being over age 70, and worked in the main street economy for 40 years.


72 posted on 01/01/2013 10:58:22 AM PST by entropy12 (The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Not revenue bills, only spending bills originate in the House.


73 posted on 01/01/2013 11:05:39 AM PST by entropy12 (The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
'All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as in other Bills'(Art.1, section 7)

The Senate is only allowed to add Amendments to the Bill sent to them by the House, not create their own Bill.

74 posted on 01/01/2013 1:24:24 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

WOW, so the senate is acting unconstitutionally? They could say the bill has already originated in the House, and these are all amendments? It won’t matter, the president has little regard for the constitution.


75 posted on 01/01/2013 2:48:31 PM PST by entropy12 (The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The United States is spending $1.6 trillion more than it takes in. The GOP has never proposed a plan that would cut one-tenth of this amount.

Sadly, you are 100% correct. And that applies to Republican Presidents as well. No one can force the Executive to spend money allocated by Congress.

76 posted on 01/01/2013 2:56:51 PM PST by Hoodat ("As for God, His way is perfect" - Psalm 18:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
I can’t recall why Republicans agreed TO CREATE this Fiscal Cliff nightmare last year. Anyone have a summary or a good link?

There's a very good reason why they call it "The Stupid Party". At the time apparently, Republicans thought it would be a good idea to expand the money supply by $2.5 trillion so that:

Did I miss anything?

77 posted on 01/01/2013 3:10:42 PM PST by Hoodat ("As for God, His way is perfect" - Psalm 18:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
It is irrelevant. Unless you close the loopholes the person making 400k will still be able to write off enough where the increase will not matter.

One man's "loophole" is another man's "stimulus". Even closing loopholes will have an impact on someone down the line... they aren't just pure opportunities to get more money from the wealthy.

78 posted on 01/01/2013 3:15:00 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

It would seem no one has regard for the Constitution!


79 posted on 01/03/2013 12:29:35 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson