Skip to comments.Michael Savage: Time for a 'nationalist' party
Posted on 01/06/2013 7:23:14 PM PST by wesagain
Michael Savage, one of the nations most prominent voices in talk radio, said today America is absolutely ripe for a third party, in part, because the two largest parties in the U.S. have pulled a charade on the American people.
There is no Republican Party, Savage told fellow talk show host Aaron Klein. Its an appendage of the Democrat machine, as weve all just seen. Its two-card Monte, as we well know. Its a game being played against the American people. Youve got the drunk Boehner on the one side, and the quasi-pseudo-crypto Marxist on the other, who is really just enjoying the ride in Hawaii right now, representing his factions.
Instead, We need a nationalist party in the United States of America, said Savage on WABCs Aaron Klein Investigative Radio, suggesting a party focused on borders, language and culture.
Get your copy of Michael Savages newly released Train Tracks: Family Stories for the Holidays from the WND Superstore!
He continued: You have the rudiments of a new party in this country called a tea party. They need to restructure their party. They need a charismatic leader, which they dont have. When you say, Tea party, no one knows who the leader is, because there is no leader. No man has stepped forward who can lead that party no one who is an articulate speaker, a charismatic mover of people.
The tea party is the rudiment of the new nationalist .......
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
He’s right that there is no republican party.
And he’s right that conservatives have no leader.
I do not know how to address that though, because I do not want a leader. I’ll lead myself. I’m done with others representing me.
Borders language culture are all side issues. Nationalism is not admirable in and of itself.
We need to return to the ONLY thing that makes America unique and free: the CONSTITUTION.
THAT is what we need to return to, Mr. Savage, because history has taught us you can be nationalist and socialist at the same time.
I never understood why in Germany the Nazi’s and the Red’s hated each other so much. They are both socialist in nature, as well Hitler was on the right in that country politically.
A couple weeks ago I was reading about the issue and I finally had the issue explained. Hitler and his Nazi’s where Nationalist (only Germans and their culture), the Reds believed in world social/communism. Thus the hatred for each other. Back to this country, it seems he have similar party’s, both increasingly socialist. One is more nationalistic (republicans), the other more worldly socialist (democrats). Ultimately, they are both evil and have long ago stopped representing their constituents.
My 2 cents.
Had one Hike. The best. Real conservative with solid Tea Party values.
And you trashed her with zeal.
I agree, the connotations of a “nationalist” party are nothing but trouble and it won’t matter one bit if they’re real or imagined.
I’d rather be known as a constitutionalist.
We can be what we are...Real Americans.
And drop acting as...AINOs.
I think we should just go with something a bit more acceptable and heartwarming. Something to bring in the kids and moms.. Like Puppy Stomper Party. Nationalists? just a little ‘much’.
So is the GOP as it works now.
American jobs. American lead.
Wake up people.
“They are both socialist in nature, as well Hitler was on the right in that country politically.”
They had major differences in terms of freedom of worship and private property rights as well; while the Bolsheviks rose with the help of the poorest people, the Nazis were supported by the middle and upper classes (ruthlessly suppressing communists who would deny the right to private property and religious worship).
The US does need a party that puts the interests of American citizens first (as currently neither party does); I include with those American citizens the most recent legalized immigrants as well. Mexicans who properly filed their paperwork and came here legitimately are among those that lose the most to illegal immigration (along with AMerican blacks).
Does it come with snappy uniforms and a sharp, stiff arm salute?
Like Puppy Stomper Party.
Thanks for the info.
“They had major differences in terms of freedom of worship and private property rights as well; while the Bolsheviks rose with the help of the poorest people, the Nazis were supported by the middle and upper classes (ruthlessly suppressing communists who would deny the right to private property and religious worship).”
Didn’t Hitler violate property rights and religious freedom as the war went on?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.