Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cableguymn
No. The constitution is the rules for the Federal Government. Not the states. Or at least that was the founders intent.

True. And very few people realize how routinely what we now consider "constitutional rights" were violated by the states in pre-civil war days.

However, the 14th Amendment has been interpreted to mean that most if not all of the Bill of Rights now applies to state and local governments.

It's doubtful those who wrote 14A intended that application, but that's how SCOTUS has interpreted it.

23 posted on 01/07/2013 4:56:44 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

The clearest explanation of the 14th Amendment and the Privileges or Immunities Clause is Clarence Thomas’s dissent in Saenz v Roe (1999). Short answer - the 14th was intended to apply the BOR to the states. See - http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-97.ZD1.html


31 posted on 01/07/2013 7:39:47 AM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson