You know, I am not interested in indulging in a name calling contest.
You established yourself as a hypocrite by claiming concern about people "becoming very serious threats to others" but ignoring the fact that at least some of the drugs you want to ban don't increase violence while the drug you want to keep legal does.
You think recreational drug abuse is benign.
Provide an exact quotation where I said that.
I don’t happen to think there is really such a thing as a “l’il bit” of recreational drug abuse. I just don’t.
You're wrong - I've seen it done with coke and with pot.
Whereas normally people have 1, 2, maybe three drinks. This is reality.
People getting drunk happens all the time. This is also reality.
being personally drunk is basically legal unless you have dependents there or whatever. I know.
So you know your previous claim that "Drunkenness is basically against the law" is garbage. Good. What have you done to advance the cause of banning drunkenness to prvent very serious threats to others? (Posts to FR count.)
You may certainly have the last word, JSNNN, I don’t enjoy your histrionics or mischaracterizations of what I say. It is not helpful and I don’t deserve it. I have made my positions clear. If you don’t like them, that is your business.