Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Test?
NPR ^ | 09 Jan 2013 | Nina Totenberg

Posted on 01/09/2013 10:39:07 AM PST by Theoria

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Lazamataz
Oh, I know. But I would then hunt the cop and his entire bloodline like a feral cat hunts a mouse.

Laz, for many years I've read your comments and most always appreciated the sense and the sentiments.

But not on this thread.

61 posted on 01/09/2013 1:54:44 PM PST by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: henkster
Yep, in Indiana they don't mess around. If you refuse the breathalyzer you get an automatic 1 year suspension of license, which I don't think can be reduced.

The wife of the Colts owner tried this approach and lost. You're better off just taking your lumps, pleading guilty to DUI and losing the license for 3-6 months, which is bad enough.

And as far as fighting the DUI in court? Good luck with that. They charge you with 2 things. IIRC, one is impairment, the other is the violation of the alcohol statute, so that if they don't get you on one, they'll get you on the other.

They do this so that people can't try and discredit the breathalyzer, and skate on a lesser charge.

62 posted on 01/09/2013 2:34:18 PM PST by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Noamie

Thank you. I hope the officer got fired. Good for you not letting him get away with it. Hope you got your money back. Of course you don’t get compensated for the time it cost you but at least it makes the police think twice before falsely accusing people.


63 posted on 01/09/2013 4:49:11 PM PST by tommix2 (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Noamie
The road-side test is designed specifically so that the person fails.I hope they understand that when a person gets to be eighty or ninety years old the person's balance may be impaired, and not be able to walk the line perfectly.
64 posted on 01/09/2013 5:10:05 PM PST by tommix2 (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: boop

“And as far as fighting the DUI in court? Good luck with that. They charge you with 2 things. IIRC, one is impairment, the other is the violation of the alcohol statute, so that if they don’t get you on one, they’ll get you on the other.”

You are correct; one is based upon “impairment,” for which the BAC test result can be “prima facie” evidence of impairment. The other charge is to simply have that much alcohol on your breath. It’s not based on blood, but breath, and there is a statutory presumption that whatever you tested is what you were when you were driving, so long as the test is done within 3 hours.

As you might guess, I am an attorney; I spent 18 years as a prosecutor and now do defense work. As a practical matter, all the jury cares about is the number. They want to hear what the test was. If you think about it, it’s what they’ve been conditioned to accept based on news stories. Whenever you hear anyone being arrested for DUI, the first thing everyone looks for is that number. If I recall correctly, Nancy Irsay blew a .17.


65 posted on 01/09/2013 5:22:20 PM PST by henkster ("The people who count the votes decide everything." -Joseph Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: henkster
I've actually met Nancy Irsay and she's a wee little thing. It wouldn't take much for her to get to 0.17.

I was living in Indy at the time and it was a big stink, because she had access to the big-time lawyers and could pay for the best defense.

She still lost.

Imagine losing your license for a whole year.

66 posted on 01/09/2013 8:12:38 PM PST by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson