Posted on 01/10/2013 9:38:32 PM PST by neverdem
So true. Lack of practice is a problem for me, for sure. I envy those who are in a location & can afford to play. Besides the fun they have now, they are the ones who will be ready to fight from the get-go.
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they TRY to take it.
I may agree with some policies in your post. But mandatory military service, no. That is involuntary servitude and deleterious to my rights.
Canned heat, Out of Stock:
http://georgia-arms.com/cannedheat223remington55grfullmetaljacket500pk.aspx
I searched yesterday for .223 rounds. Found two places with them, Black Hills Varmint Grenades and the Zombie rounds. They’re probably sold out today.
The only terminology needed is the wording of the second ammendment. It was written in plain language with specific words placed in specific order to make a simple plain message.
Make the left admit that they are trying to destroy the constitution.
if the definition of a criminal is one who violates the law, and since the basis of our laws is our constitution, what does that make the one who violates the constitution? I'll answer that. It makes him a criminal. Since criminals are prohibited from having or using weapons, then it is only logical that we remove the ability for them to have or use weapons. And their weapons include the jack booted thugs who raid the homes of those who have not been proven to be guilty of any crimes.
Someone needs to make a serious “Reporters/Editors Guide to Guns” as a single sheet with drawings and diagrams restating the same thing we’ve been saying for decades.
On top of that post something to YouTube with the same name. Let it go viral and you’ve killed the ideas they’re basing their attacks on.
It’s that easy and JPFO, GOA or the NRA, SAS, etc. could do it easily. Plus, their spokepersons need to refuse to accept the lie when interviewed. Explain it over and over again.
It is NOT an “Assault Weapon”, it is a semi auto firearm.
It is NOT “Gun Control”. It is disarming civilians.
Lets not use their terms and thus not let them set the terms of the discussion.
We can take away their presumption, their false assumptions, and their implied lies by not accepting their terms.
It might wake up some liberals, and frag some homosexuals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.