Posted on 01/11/2013 7:27:03 AM PST by Uncle Chip
An administrative worker at Connecticut’s coroner’s office has been placed on paid leave after allegedly allowing her husband to view the body of Newtown gunman Adam Lanza.
Jean Henry, a processing technician at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, could face disciplinary action after the investigation is complete, the Hartford Courant reported. She was still on leave Thursday, sources said.
Henry is accused of allowing her husband, who is not a state employee, to enter a refrigerated autopsy room where Lanza’s body was awaiting a post mortem on Dec. 16. The only people allowed in the autopsy area are authorized staff and some law enforcement personnel, the Courant reported.
During the macabre viewing, Henry unzipped the bag so her husband could look at Lanza, who shot dead 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14. The couple “openly” went in and out of the refrigerated room and at least one other employee was aware of what was happening, sources told the newspaper.
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
So the 6-year-old was an eyewitness, and you are denying what she said.
Isn’t that exactly what I said you would do if someone said they were an eye-witness?
I would presume that at some point, they will show the girl a picture of several people, including Adam, and ask her to identify the shooter.
On the other hand, the police probably are not sharing the conspiracy theory, so maybe they take their own eye-witness information more truthfully than you would. But since you would want to ensure that there were no other people involved, I would presume they will question every person in that school to ascertain if there were others.
Who is the mystery man (mystery man to us) that LEO nabbed in the forestry area adjacent to the school. The man who was, was said to have said "I didn't do this" or something like that. Where is this man?
Did he immediately profess his innocence or was he told about it? Did he know what happened at the school BEFORE he was told about it?
I'm guessing he was told, just because the alternate explanations are to weird and unsettling.
How do we pick and choose which parts of the clearly erroneous initial reporting were are going to accept, in order to call other parts of that same reporting a lie?
If the whole thing was a conspiracy, and to be so it would need to be well-orchestrated, why would the official sources that would have to be involved in the conspiracy actually REPORT things that would reveal the conspiracy?
Oh wait, it must be that double-negative thinking, you know, we reveal the conspiracy so we can later say there clearly wasn’t a conspiracy because we wouldn’t have revealed it..”
I’ve been personally involved in enough reporting to understand that people rush to get information out, instead of trying to verify what they are releasing. It leads to a lot of false reports, before you get the truth.
I’d rather wait 4 hours and get the truth, than get the information real-time and put up with the many incorrect reports.
I don’t deny the conspiracy. I see no rational basis for believing it. If they eventually find enough evidence to make it plausible, then I certainly will be happy to report that information.
As I said, it wouldn’t matter in this particular case — I was simply pointing out that they probably have a rule like that for good reason, in case someone wanted to try to argue that the rule was in place simply so nobody would be able to see Adam’s body, as part of the conspiracy.
On the other hand, if I were part of the Lanza family, and wanted to join the conspiracy in order to get Adam off for the crime, I might use this as conspiracy evidence that the police were letting people tamper with Adam’s body to plant evidence that he was shooting.
Because certainly they could have examined his body and found that there was no evidence that he shot any weapons that day, if he wasn’t the shooter. You might want to prove he was murdered, instead of having committed suicide. Coroners do that all the time, you can often tell whether a shot was self-inflicted or not, but if the evidence was tampered with you would have trouble taking it to court.
Did you read the story?
” The unnamed child was the sole of survivor of a class of 15, it emerged today, and burst from the school “covered in blood from head to toe”.
As she was reunited with her distraught mother, the little girl said: “Mummy, I’m okay, but all my friends are dead”, according to Rev Jim Solomon, a local pastor.
Asked how the child described the killer, Rev Solomon told ABC News: “She saw someone who she felt was angry, who she felt was mad.”
All 14 of her other classmates were killed, leaving police to describe how “there were 14 coats hanging there and 14 bodies”.
- - - -
Unnamed child, distraught unnamed mother...
Come on sheep you have to do better than that.
I agree CharlesWayneCT.
BTTT.
hummingbird
Do I deny something happened at Sandy Hook School? No, I don’t. I’m just not exactly sure what happened there. And neither are you. We don’t know Adam Lanz killed anybody especially since he only had two (or maybe four) hand guns on him and his ‘long rifle’ (either shotgun or AR-15) was found in the car in the parking lot belonging to Christopher Rhodia, a drug dealer. Especially since the ME says the kids were shot with a ‘long weapon’ which could’ve been an error, since the long weapon was in the car and the ME was really busy, busy making sure the reporters got his name right instead. The narrative for the incident for about 28 days by the ‘expert’ journalists and researchers in the media genre and law enforcement has read like something out of Alice in Wonderland. And of course the youtube blogger showing us pictures of our presidunce hugging a dead ‘Emilie Parker’ at the memorial, as well as 279 pictures on CBS or NBC showing the funerals of only 4 of the children on different days with people wearing the same clothes, as well as the same caskets. To be honest I haven’t a farking clue what happened at Sandy Hook. The ‘narrative’ is crazy, and the facts just don’t add up.
You forgot that the girl was wearing “red, black, and silver — the colors of Satanism”.
Maybe that part was a little too out there, even for you, or maybe you just thought that would be too much for others here to put up with.
It’s all an illuminati thing. They faked a girls death, and then had her pose in a nationwide-distributed photo with the President of the United States.
You know, that is just like those evil conspirers, always rubbing their actions in our faces by exposing their dead kids in highly public photos.
Could you please post your credentials that show you are an expert on the speech patterns and habits of six year olds.
You asked for a witness — I gave you one.
And it was a little girl who says that she saw his face and she said that he was angry. She will probably be asked by authorities to describe him further and perhaps identify a picture of him.
Did you want her to go into detail about him after she ran out of the school???.
She didn’t know that people would think that she was lying, otherwise she should have sat down right on the spot with her crayons and draw some pictures for you.
I agree with your post.
BTTT.
hummingbird
“Nobody, but NOBODY, should be able to examine any of the evidence in this “case” until the narrative has been fully figured out.”
And this is different from any other investigation how exactly? Were the autopsy photos of the Columbine shooters released within a couple weeks of that shooting? If not, was that evidence of a conspiracy too?
It turned out to be a parent of one of the kids who was bringing stuff to the school.
Funny. The conspiracy nuts seem to think that bodies should be paraded before the cameras for their viewing, as a matter of course.
You're welcome, RR!
I posted to you because we were both on Natalee Holloway threads. That case and this one are similar in that there are so many open-ended questions.
Maybe both will be "solved" some day.
hummingbird
Sorry, Boogieman; you’re correct again. No difference at all from any other previous investigation. My bad.
I heard that, too.
Hadn't thought of this...good point.
hummingbird
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.