Posted on 01/11/2013 8:55:59 PM PST by jimluke01
A pretty, young, auburn-haired woman – mid-20s – drove down a lonely country road somewhere in Oklahoma. Appearing in her rearview mirror, at the back windshield, were two menacing orbs of light floating amid ashen dusk. The guttural roar of a souped-up big block shook the tiny Volkswagen Rabbit as a van-load of inbred thugs lurched left and drew alongside her. A ponytailed passenger taunted inaudibly and blew foul kisses between crude hand gestures. He pointed for her to pull over as the van repeatedly swerved dangerously close.
Inside the car a man, asleep in the reclining passenger seat, was startled awake by the commotion. He rose and darted his head about, calmly assessing the situation. This only spurred the evil-bent goons. As they ramped-up efforts to run the car off the road, the man reached in the glove box, withdrew a military-grade, semi-automatic handgun – an “assault weapon,” if you will – and, with intentionality and great theatre, leaned across his young bride, pointing the gun out the open bay and directly between dirt bag’s booze-flushed eyes.
Van vanished amid a plume of gray smoke as wheels locked, tires screeched and “assault vehicle” fishtailed – jerking to a halt with taillights aglow skyward from the ditch.
Not a shot was fired.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
We can do nothing as individuals but die under the force of the organised.
The Police are organised.
The first few raids will set the tone. They will shoot up a few homes, kill some people ,jail some poor bass tards,and then we will either organise and put a stop to it or pass our guns over and watch America die.
Not necessarily, War, like love, is an affirmative act.
The next Civil War will not be fought on battlefields with organized opposing forces. It will be fought by one side doing a now-shameful job for a paycheck, and the other side of experienced hunters and veterans fighting for their freedom and survival.
Whatever "Gulf of Tonkin" incident is needed will be manufactured. Witness the Benghazi fiasco - the complete underlying story won't come out for 20 years.
Know what you mean.
Too old to run, too mean to die, and remorse isn’t in the dictionary.
Never did know how this remorse crap started.
Why should you have remorse for doing what needs to be done to save your life?
Being president Obama would uses the army, and the traitorous unpurged elements of the National Guard.
He doesn’t need unions to do anything but support him, hes got a professional force. But that all assumes Obama is alive at all. If there was a 2nd civil war of any kind it would be a tactical imperative for the rebels to take Obama out in the opening days. Therefore Zero wont be doing much of anything at all, his successor will.
In any event it is almost impossible to believe that a shooting war could happen in the next 4 years Obama is even eligible(constitutionally) to be president. There is far too much to do for the “rebels” to prepare for that day, both politically and structurally.
Politically:
1: Conservative state governments have to be purged of imperialist and dominated by patriots.
2: Conservative State populations must similarly be impassioned in the cause of liberty at a fervor patriot pinch.
Structurally:
3: State military & defense assets including the aforementioned national guard beurl have to be purged of the “loyalest” federal pawns. Their officers must consist entirely of patriots.
3: That is just the national guard, when it becomes clear war is coming What little influence we have left in congress will have to be directed towards abolition of the Federal army, and mothballing the navy..
All of theses tasks are interrelated, and to be frank all of them will happen more or less on their own as our population becomes more polarized by Washington’s political misdeeds in the coming years & decades, but few if any of them will be competed in the next 4 years.
The sheer size of the task and the structural changes diliberatly made by Linclin and his predecessors to make us subservient to their will mandate that theses tasks will be difficult and time consuming.
The big Coup will be getting Liberals and Democrats to realizes just how much they hate us and don’t want us around. You do that and their wont be a war, simply a mutual agreement that we are better off separate. That in my mind is our real goal. Washington political both left and allegedly right will make that difficult thou.
Being president Obama would uses the army, and the traitorous unpurged elements of the National Guard.
He doesn’t need unions to do anything but support him, hes got a professional force. But that all assumes Obama is alive at all. If there was a 2nd civil war of any kind it would be a tactical imperative for the rebels to take Obama out in the opening days. Therefore Zero wont be doing much of anything at all, his successor will.
In any event it is almost impossible to believe that a shooting war could happen in the next 4 years Obama is even eligible(constitutionally) to be president. There is far too much to do for the “rebels” to prepare for that day, both politically and structurally.
Politically:
1: Conservative state governments have to be purged of imperialist and dominated by patriots.
2: Conservative State populations must similarly be impassioned in the cause of liberty at a fervor patriot pinch.
Structurally:
3: State military & defense assets including the aforementioned national guard beurl have to be purged of the “loyalest” federal pawns. Their officers must consist entirely of patriots.
4: That is just the national guard, when it becomes clear war is coming What little influence we have left in congress will have to be directed towards abolition of the Federal army, and mothballing the navy..
All of theses tasks are interrelated, and to be frank all of them will happen more or less on their own as our population becomes more polarized by Washington’s political misdeeds in the coming years & decades, but few if any of them will be competed in the next 4 years.
The sheer size of the task and the structural changes diliberatly made by Linclin and his predecessors to make us subservient to their will mandate that theses tasks will be difficult and time consuming.
The big Coup will be getting Liberals and Democrats to realizes just how much they hate us and don’t want us around. You do that and their wont be a war, simply a mutual agreement that we are better off separate. That in my mind is our real goal. Washington political both left and allegedly right will make that difficult thou.
In 1994/1995 Bill Clinton and the left started a talking points campaign that the “Right Wing Extremist”, being led by Rush, wanted to assassinate Bill Clinton.
Low and behold Clinton took a trip the the Philippine's and shazam there was an assignation plot against Clinton by al Quaeda.
In 2008/2009 Zippo and the left started a talking points campaign that the “Right Wing Extremist”, being led by Beck this time< wanted to assassinate Zippo.
Low and behold Hillary took an unexpected trip overseas and shazam there was an assignation plot against Hillary by al Quaeda.
We now have Zippo doing all things Lincoln.
What you want to bet there is an attempted assignation of Zippo by al Quaeda and they try and make it appear as if the “Right Wing Extremist” have teamed up with the terrorist to wage war against the US?
I say with respect that I am convinced that you are mistaken. There is no real problem with our existing constitution, the problem is that our elected government refuses to abide by it. Why should anyone believe that calling a convention to change the constitution will correct this problem?
I see it as the same thinking that leads some people to believe that the problem of people using guns to murder people in violation of laws prohibiting murder can be solved by passing laws against guns. The problem is not one that can be solved by passing laws and the problem of a lawless gangster government cannot be solved by changing the constitution. The existing amendments have all come about one by one except for the first ten and I would suggest that some of them have turned out to be grievous errors with the twenty sixth being the most recent such error. To open up the possibility of a total rewriting would almost certainly accomplish nothing but destruction.
I have said for years that our elections have devolved to become a contest to see which candidate can promise to violate the constitution in the most appealing ways. Then when one is elected he swears to uphold the document he just spent two years promising to violate. Why would anyone be surprised when he totally disregards the constitution from that day on? Why would anyone imagine that changing the constitution will bring any different result?
The source of the problem is the voters and many of those who now vote were barred from voting by the original constitution and or by the state laws regarding voter qualifications, the only changes needed are to once again bar those people from voting. When people continue to reelect the likes of Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Biden and Obama and steadfastly refuse to consider electing decent human beings it is the voters who need to be changed, not the constitution, except insofar as the constitution needs to be changed to stop some of them from voting.
In fact the call for a constitutional convention makes me think of someone who has gone to a doctor with a complaint and left with a prescription and calls the doctor three days later and demands another prescription because he is not feeling any better. When the doctor asks if he took his medicine as directed he replies that he never actually had the prescription filled.
Meanwhile, the urban natives are restless...
“Too old to run, too mean to die, and remorse isn’t in the dictionary.”
That, sir, is a beautiful turn of phrase.
Before the November election, there were rumblings about civil war and such, but it never seemed real. Speculative musing might be the best term for it, or maybe it was just grumpy old patriots venting their inner Patrick Henrys.
Now, since the election, talk of revolution and CWII is much more open ... and it’s scary as hell.
I still hold out hope that at least ONE of the States finds the courage to tell the federal monster to go to hell. Just one. That’s all it will take. Then we can all draw our lines in the sand and wait for the other side to make a move.
I will try to answer from the knowledge that I have picked up so far and this is just my understanding of the process.
A CC is certainly not without risk but that must be weighed against the risk of staying our current course and doing nothing.
So lets take the hypothetical that the libs from California propose a change (amendment) that would do away with the 2nd amendment right to bear arms. This however would be very difficult when you consider the majority of the states and thus delegates would be from red states but for the sake or discussion lets say they do.
This process of a Constitutional convention serves only to PROPOSE an amendment. The safeguard is these amendments would then have to be ratified by the states just like ANY other amendment. Left wing ideas rarely have even the slightest chance of passage when given a direct vote of the people. So the chances of the left being able to overturn the second amendment or implement any change that would give more power to government is very very slim. This is why the left fear amendments to the Constitution. The left knows they can't win these battles and we can.
The left does not have the coverage to win on a level playing field. They simply don't have the numbers and NEVER have had them. This is why they have always sought to stack the courts with leftist judges. Statists know they will never have the votes to take liberty from the people. The left is only beating us and running the country because the have spent decades taking over key political positions, the media, the courts and the schools, but the reality is that their numbers are few. They can't beat us in a fair election. This is THE reason the democrats are so resistant to a balanced budget amendment. They know the CAN'T win if the states get to vote.
The good news is our Constitution gives the states the power to correct the course of the country and regain liberty when the federal government has become corrupt or refuses to control itself. The bad news is I think we have a narrow window of time to get this done.
I recommend this paper by the Goldwater institute to learn more about amending the Constitution by convention. It's a fairly short 3 part series. Here is a link to the introduction.
http://goldwaterinstitute.org/article/amending-constitution-convention-complete-view-founders-plan-part-1-series
assignation??
Boy that was a screw up wasn’t it.
Time for some different glasses I guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.