Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The End of Labor: How to Protect Workers From the Rise of Robots
The Atlantic ^ | 1/14/2013 | Noah Smith

Posted on 01/15/2013 9:35:42 AM PST by ksen

For most of modern history, two-thirds of the income of most rich nations has gone to pay salaries and wages for people who work, while one-third has gone to pay dividends, capital gains, interest, rent, etc. to the people who own capital. This two-thirds/one-third division was so stable that people began to believe it would last forever. But in the past ten years, something has changed. Labor's share of income has steadily declined, falling by several percentage points since 2000. It now sits at around 60% or lower. The fall of labor income, and the rise of capital income, has contributed to America's growing inequality.

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
Whatever your views: conservative/liberal, the prospect of potentially putting most of the workforce out of work and unable to earn a living through the use of automation should make you a bit nervous.

I believe that this is one issue that should, in a rational world, transcend political divides.

1 posted on 01/15/2013 9:35:47 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ksen

Wooden shoes work well to jam up the machinery...


2 posted on 01/15/2013 9:36:48 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Here's a tangentially related story.
3 posted on 01/15/2013 9:38:54 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

lol, sabo-tage.

why does that make me think if Kim Cattrall?


4 posted on 01/15/2013 9:39:03 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Hence the Term Sabotage

French workers would through them in the machinery in the early 1800's.

5 posted on 01/15/2013 9:40:17 AM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billorites

not clicking that link at work buddy! :whyyou:


6 posted on 01/15/2013 9:40:23 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
You worked with Robots right cripple?

I used to work with once but It called me fat so we had a falling out ;)

7 posted on 01/15/2013 9:41:29 AM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Whatever your views: conservative/liberal, the prospect of potentially putting most of the workforce out of work and unable to earn a living through the use of automation should make you a bit nervous.

This sounds a bit like 0bama complaining about ATMs and online air travel reservations for unemployment.

We don't dig ditches anymore. I eliminate administrative staff time with innovative software solutions, but people still work.

Change is the only constant. We have to deal with it.

8 posted on 01/15/2013 9:42:32 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

You can’t protect workers from the forces of history and technology. Workers need to protect themselves. Get new skills, things nobody is projecting as being automated in the next 20 years, when in doubt learn how to run the robots.


9 posted on 01/15/2013 9:42:39 AM PST by discostu (I recommend a fifth of Jack and a bottle of Prozac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Onward progress, I say. Free people up to do other things. We’ve had this argument throughout our history (horse and buggy, ice man, milk man, etc) and those that want to hold onto the old way are always wrong.

Don’t fall for it. Bring on the robots.


10 posted on 01/15/2013 9:45:01 AM PST by youngidiot (God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Not nervous at all.


11 posted on 01/15/2013 9:45:43 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

lol, sabo-tage.

why does that make me think if Kim Cattrall?

Most Illogical....


12 posted on 01/15/2013 9:46:55 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: discostu
You can’t protect workers from the forces of history and technology.

Sure you can.

13 posted on 01/15/2013 9:49:29 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ksen
For most of modern history, two-thirds of the income of most rich nations has gone to pay salaries and wages for people who work, while one-third has gone to pay dividends, capital gains, interest, rent, etc. to the people who own capital.

What a very starnge formulation!

Do nations have "income"?
Does the nation pay your salary?
Does the nation pay you a dividend? Capital gains? Does the nation pay you any rent?

In a perfect Socialist world, where the means of product are communally owned, then I suppose "the nation" might have a vast income, and might parcel that money out to the laboring classes.

But we're not there ... yet.

14 posted on 01/15/2013 9:51:32 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot
Free people up to do other things.

Like have a revolution if the economy gets structured in such a way that they cannot make a living for themselves because over half of the available jobs have been automated?

How will they do "other things" if they aren't able to earn the money to finance those "other things?"

15 posted on 01/15/2013 9:52:26 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Sorry but you’re wrong. People have been having this discussion since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution and the situation has remained consistent, people who adapt their skills thrive, people that insist reality stop progressing fail. The technology WILL advance, the percentage of our manual labor done by machine WILL increase, the need for low skill workers WILL decrease. People need to protect themselves, not expect the world to help them.


16 posted on 01/15/2013 9:53:28 AM PST by discostu (I recommend a fifth of Jack and a bottle of Prozac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot

Oh, and I’m not arguing that advancing technology is a bad thing. I’m saying as it advances there should be ways to help open up opportunities for a wide swathe of people to become capital owners and thus able to participate in the large increases in the return on capital that seems to be coming our way over the next few decades.

I think the author has some intriguing ideas along these lines: i.e. relaxing Sarbanes-Oxley a bit in order to make it more attractive for more companies to go public.


17 posted on 01/15/2013 9:57:44 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ksen

I suppose we’ll all have jobs as government bureaucrats, regulating the robots. Or as Diversity Coordinators for the Splunge Foundation, or somesuch.


18 posted on 01/15/2013 9:58:20 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Well change makes everyone nervous espceially change that affects jobs. Understand. However robot labor is inevitable and won’t be stopped nor should it be stopped. Whatever can be automated in a quality manner will and should be automated. There will still be jobs for people but they will be different new types of jobs. People must adapt. I am looking forward to low cost home robots that can do chores around the house.


19 posted on 01/15/2013 9:59:16 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Technology and advancements were supposed to cut down on the hours worked and improve salaries.

Times have changed. Basically, both couples usually work, we work more hours, and salaries are stagnant. Don't worry though, we are more productive now than ever before!

Throw in more millions into the labor force via amnesty and your gonna have a utopia!

20 posted on 01/15/2013 9:59:37 AM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson