Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conscience of a Conservative

The posted web site date was probably from a correctly set system, because it was picked up by google’s caching the next day. That verified that it was posted BEFORE the shootings. Capiche?


62 posted on 01/16/2013 12:04:01 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

Where are you seeing that the “posted web site date” was picked up by google’s caching the next day? What evidence do you have that the posted web site date for the fundraising page (December 11) came from a different source than the posted web site dates for the other pages (July, Sept, Oct)?


63 posted on 01/16/2013 12:22:49 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
Also, if the Sandy Hook shooting was part of some massive conspiracy, why would the United Way be involved? Why would they, of all people, have prior knowledge of the shooting? And if they had prior knowledge of the shooting, why would they risk blowing the whole damn conspiracy by posting a website about it two days in advance?
65 posted on 01/16/2013 12:25:49 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
The posted web site date was probably from a correctly set system, because it was picked up by google’s caching the next day. That verified that it was posted BEFORE the shootings.

Nope. The date listed is not the date Google spidered the page.

It's the date Google's indexing algorithm decided to assign to the page. Figuring out page dates is not one of Google's stronger points. But, to be fair, it's a hard problem, given web authors can put whatever they want on a page. Actually, it might be nice if Google would actually let you select on the cache date. But they don't, as far as I know.

You encounter this problem whenever somebody relatively obscure suddenly finds himself very much in the news for whatever reason. The natural impulse is to do a Google search on the person with a date restriction ending just before the newsworthy incident, in hopes of avoiding all the redundant news accounts, blog posts, and tweets and actually turning up something worth knowing about before it gets scrubbed. However, because of its imperfections, Google's date filtering rarely cuts down the clutter enough to be helpful. In such cases, I find myself turning to Yandex, where their bug — less frequent spidering — becomes a feature. They don't have the clutter simply because they haven't yet got around to sucking it into their engine.

75 posted on 01/16/2013 1:38:19 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson