I can’t find ANY children in ANY helicopter shot.
I can’t find Children meeting up with their parents from the air but of course it could be difficult to detect.
I can’t find the numbers that would go along with this incident.
Were NONE of the children injured but alive???
It’s possible they were either dead or mentally traumatized.
Why is all of this important?
Obama is seizing on this incident to take away your 2nd amendment rights.
Something is off about the information that is being given to the public.
Why are things like that important.
Let’s take Sorcha Faal. He writes a story. It gets picked up on news outlets. It circulates the net. It gets posted here over and over again on this site with people believing what he is saying is true.
Every time I see this I tell people to look at the original source.
It is really unclear whether he is just an internet hoaxster, a democrat operative, or doing the bidding of some intelligence service from some country.
There could be more to the Sorcha Faal story.
Just like there could be more to this one.
Is the Sandy Hook never happened line of inquiry instigated by the same thinking or operative as Sorcha Faal???
Make everyone scream NUTTER while hiding something else?
I definitely believe it is possible.
There is no way that I believe the media wouldn’t take more pictures of all of those kids.
You don’t just take one a couple of pictures. You snap away at this kind of incident and later decide what to use.
This story is so huge and so germane to Obama’s argument it doesn’t make sense that these are the only photos released.
Unless the Obama regime demanded them not to be released
“Why is all of this important?
Obama is seizing on this incident to take away your 2nd amendment rights.”
Alright, this is really, in my opinion, the heart of the matter. Yes, he is seizing on the incident and using it for political cover for gun control. I doubt anyone on FR will dispute that.
Now, they’re still investigating Sandy Hook, and nobody knows what the full report will turn out to be. In the meantime, Americans on the whole accept the “official” story that we know, and they aren’t likely to be convinced of any conspiracy theory, at least not very quickly. It took decades, countless books, television specials, a publicized court case, hearings in the House of Representatives, and a major Hollywood motion picture before most of America was convinced that the Warren Report version of the JFK assassination was probably not the whole story. No conspiracy theory, even if it is successful, will catch on with the majority of the public very quickly.
So, if your goal is to stop Obama’s gun control agenda, which he is pushing right now and trying to accomplish quickly, then what is the point of pursuing conspiracy theories? Even if you were right, and could eventually find the evidence to convince a majority of the public, you will not be able to do so in time to stop Obama. In fact, in the short term, you’re probably being counterproductive to that goal, since your speculations can be used to tarnish right wing opposition to Obama’s proposals as the stuff of conspiracy theorists.
Basically, what I’m saying is, if we want to stop Obama, this may be the worst possible strategy to go about doing so. We should be focusing on stopping him whether the Sandy Hook story is 100% factual or 100% horsecrap, and our tactics shouldn’t depend on either one necessarily being the case, it should be completely irrelevant.