Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Para-Ord.45

I am trying to see what I missed. Basically its saying if someone is a certified nut they should be prevented from buying or owing weapons. Who can disagree with that?


31 posted on 01/16/2013 9:49:58 AM PST by Orange1998 (DO NOT PRESS CTRL W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Orange1998

> “I am trying to see what I missed. Basically its saying if someone is a certified nut they should be prevented from buying or owing weapons. Who can disagree with that?”

The question is WHO decides who is a certified nut. Biden (and many more Demoncrats) have called lawful gunowners “crazy” or “nuts” on many occasions.


57 posted on 01/16/2013 9:59:48 AM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Orange1998
I am trying to see what I missed. Basically its saying if someone is a certified nut they should be prevented from buying or owing weapons. Who can disagree with that?

Depends on the definition of "certified nut".

Have you, OR ANY MEMBER OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD, ever seen a psychiatrist of psychologist for depression, anxiety issues, PTSD, or any other psychological issue?

Would you be comfortable with that medical data being stored in a gun-check database?

If a psych is sent a governmental query about you, asking him to certify that you are OK to own a firearm, what percentage of psychs will stick their necks out to so certify? Will their liability insurance provider even ALLOW them to give a positive answer to such an official query?

69 posted on 01/16/2013 10:06:19 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Orange1998
I am trying to see what I missed. Basically its saying if someone is a certified nut they should be prevented from buying or owing weapons. Who can disagree with that?

Government doctors to certify who is "nuts"?

Constitutionalists
Tea Party
Religious to an extreme
Bitter clingers
Anti-baby killers
Global warming deniers

117 posted on 01/16/2013 11:01:17 AM PST by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Orange1998

Yeah, but who defines what is mentally ill? Soon all people with conservative belief could be labeled mentally ill.


126 posted on 01/16/2013 11:29:02 AM PST by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Orange1998
All they have to do is redefine what is considered psychologically 'abnormal'. At one time, for instance, homosexuality was considered deviant behaviour. Now they have redefined it as something else, and made homosexuals a protected group.

So if someone comes up with some new term and defines it as a psychological malady, the most sane people here could be regarded as nutcases.

Where it used to be, "In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.", now they just want to call you insane and put your eye out.

135 posted on 01/17/2013 1:40:02 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson