Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/18/2013 6:46:05 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: darrellmaurina

This ain’t Australia, mate. It won’t work the same way here.


2 posted on 01/18/2013 6:49:53 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

So you might as well be talking about ‘Earth’ and ‘Mars’ then, which leaves the point is utterly meaningless.


3 posted on 01/18/2013 6:50:24 AM PST by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina; marktwain; Joe Brower; MestaMachine; Nachum

4 posted on 01/18/2013 6:51:05 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

I dont know possessed the estimable Aussies to obey your fascistic command but I know I speak for more than a few million Americans when I tell you or any other gungrabber to pound sand.


5 posted on 01/18/2013 6:51:05 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

This is not Australia.


6 posted on 01/18/2013 6:52:04 AM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina; Antoninus; napscoordinator; cripplecreek; wagglebee; AmericanInTokyo; ...
This is potentially a blueprint for anti-gun people in the Republican Party. I believe we need to watch this carefully.

Liberal Democrats and anti-gun Republicans will be looking for ways to divide conservatives on guns, and examples from other countries probably need to be used since most of the high-profile anti-gun Republicans (Bloomburg, for example) have been driven out of the GOP, or at least out of politically relevant leadership positions.

The comment by the author at the end of my excerpt that he doesn't think there should be Bill of Rights because it restricts legislative power is a particularly blunt warning — that is why we need a written constitution (unlike Britain) and a written Bill of Rights that cannot be amended without supermajorities of the Congress and the states.

8 posted on 01/18/2013 6:52:42 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina
"Australia, correctly in my view, does not have a Bill of Rights..."

Wow.

10 posted on 01/18/2013 6:53:25 AM PST by Washi (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SkyDancer
WOW!

I guess you guys must NOT treat gunshot wounds then eh?/sarc

11 posted on 01/18/2013 6:54:51 AM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

“the United States had to fight for it”

Exactly.


12 posted on 01/18/2013 6:54:51 AM PST by zagger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina
Australia, correctly in my view, does not have a Bill of Rights, so our legislatures have more say than America’s over many issues of individual rights,

Wow. And if the legislature has say over it then it is a privilege and not a right. A privilege which can be taken away at the legislature's whim.

15 posted on 01/18/2013 6:57:32 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

>>> Also, we have no constitutional right to bear arms. (After all, the British granted us nationhood peacefully; the United States had to fight for it.)

Well, then you Aussies need to wait for your next overlord to grant your ‘freedom’ peacefully.

[Sorry I didn’t read the whole article, the excerpt is as far as I can stomach.]


18 posted on 01/18/2013 6:58:58 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

So you did it because you could and the hell with those who wanted to keep their weapons: because they had no bill of rights.

Yeah,,,,spoken like a true fascist azzhole...sorta like the one we have now.
Except we do have a bill of rights and we know how to fight for it.[At least we did...some of still remember.]


20 posted on 01/18/2013 7:01:13 AM PST by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina
-- I can, however, describe what I, as prime minister of Australia, did to curb gun violence ... --

Yeah, you acted in a way that caused an increase in violence against innocents. Way to go!

And, this should not come as a surprise to anybody with more than half a brain, he's PROUD of the results. Exactly what was intended. Enable thugs, disparage honesty.

22 posted on 01/18/2013 7:02:23 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina
While death by gun may be down due to the tyrannical ability of a state to remove a good portion of them, overall it just increases the options for criminals. The Aussies confiscated guns early in 1996:


26 posted on 01/18/2013 7:04:29 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

Australia, correctly in my view, does not have a Bill of Rights,
______________________________________

ever heard of the Magna Carta, fellow ???


27 posted on 01/18/2013 7:05:08 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina
Australian former prime minister confiscated 700,000 guns

Around 1 million guns were surrendered and destroyed. The Australian government claims it was 1/3 of the nation's private arsenal, so by their own admission 2/3 of the guns are still in private hands as contraband.

28 posted on 01/18/2013 7:07:34 AM PST by Spirochete (Sic transit gloria mundi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

The difference is here in the colonies we kicked the bastards out of power and adopted a Bill of Rights.

Australia continued to be under British Law and never corrected that problem when they became officially independent.

I’ll never understand surrender monkeys. A lot of Australians have their roots in people who were imprisoned and sent there by the Brits. You would think that they would re-assess some of the baggage of being a British serf.

Its sort of like the Welsh and Scots volunteering to fight for the evil descendents of Edward Long Shanks.


29 posted on 01/18/2013 7:08:56 AM PST by ZULU (See video: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-first-siege-of-vienna.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

Hey John, you’re lecturing. Martin Bryant, the mentally disturbed shooter was the problem, not the gun.

All your actions on gun control reminds me of the guy who took his car to the shop because his brakes quit working.

When he picked up his car, the mechanic told him

“We couldn’t fix the brakes, so we turned up the volume on the horn”

You fix everything but the problem.


34 posted on 01/18/2013 7:12:24 AM PST by nomobs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: darrellmaurina

I’m guessing that half of the firearms purchased since Obama seized power would be turned in if the tyrant demanded it. That leaves only 33 million firearms for the ATF and others willing to violate the Constitution and our God-given human rights to take by force. When you consider how many things will go wrong in the first few hundred thousand attempted seizures, with each side knowing that the other side is armed and at least potentially willing to shoot, that will become problematic quickly.


35 posted on 01/18/2013 7:12:54 AM PST by Pollster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Maybe this popular Australian young adult fiction series would have been less popular if everybody knew that an invasion of the large Australian land mass by land-hungry Chinese would be unthinkable since there'd be a gun-toting behind every kangaroo?
37 posted on 01/18/2013 7:13:12 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson