Just about everyone who conservatives put their hopes in today for the future, are tea party candidates.
Your agenda is clear because you are attacking conservatism in general, the tea party’s existence.
There is no election going on, no primary, yet your sole purpose at FR is to constantly harp on the same theme over and over, move left, support rinos, choose rinos, prefer rinos, just get used to thinking in terms of rinos only.
You are on a mission to weaken conservatism, period.
You don’t need to know any names of future candidates, or their qualifications or odds for winning, because your mission never changes, your message is always the same, move left, all you know is that someone in some future race will be more liberal than the other, and those unknown rinos are who you are already fighting for, sight unseen.
You don't have the political insight to understand winning this war against the left requires intelligent tactics and a long term strategy. It means taking stock of where we are and finding unity among enough conservatives to achieve a governing majority. We won't get far by just defaulting to the most "pure" candidate at all times. I understand that approach is simplistic and appealing to you, but it doesn't work very well. That is why nominating the most conservative candidate that CAN win is an important lesson and the right way to go. Being correct is just not enough. If it was, this nation wouldn't be in the mess we're in. In politics, the candidate is often more important than his or her policy positions. I wish it wasn't that way, but it is. Speaking out against dopey candidates like O'Donnell is always going to make short sighted people like you angry, but it needs to be done.