Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Longbow1969

Your posts are just far too long because of the mass of personal insults and gibberish and lies.

Romney did not run on the GOP’s pro-life platform, he publicly rejected it, and announced a list of exceptions which amount to abortion on demand (health), and started running pro-abortion TV ads on preserving abortion “options”.

Romney restated that he would do nothing about the success of the implementation of his 20 year goal of homosexualizing the military, nor changing his mind about supporting homosexual Scout leaders.

You are denying the facts, but we have the video.


51 posted on 01/25/2013 11:46:47 AM PST by ansel12 (Cruz said "conservatives trust Sarah Palin that if she says this guy is a conservative, that he is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
Romney did not run on the GOP’s pro-life platform, he publicly rejected it, and announced a list of exceptions which amount to abortion on demand (health)

Romney ran as a pro-life candidate. Period. He was endorsed by most, if not all, of the major pro-life organizations. Even when Romney tried to avoid talking about abortion, the pro-life groups publicly stuck by him. You may think he's lying, you may think he isn't pure enough on the issue, you may not like that he didn't adhere to the exact GOP platform position, but he did run as a pro-life candidate and won the backing of pro-life organizations. You are flat out lying when you claim he ran on a pro-abortion platform.

Romney restated that he would do nothing about the success of the implementation of his 20 year goal of homosexualizing the military,

The ban on open homo's in the military isn't going to come back. That train has left the station. The public seems to support the abolition of DADT and no Republican will run in a general election for the reinstatement of it. We've lost that fight. Elections have consequences, that's why defeating Obama was so important in 2008 and 2012 - even if that meant the Republican alternative would have been a mushy moderate on many issues.

And this nonsense you spout about Romney running against Christianity is just foul and stupid. You may disagree with him on issues, but to accuse him of running against Christianity is low even for you.

52 posted on 01/25/2013 12:10:46 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson