Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton tries to silence Bindi Irwin on population growth
news.com.au ^ | 24th January 2013 | Kristin Shorten

Posted on 01/23/2013 5:43:25 PM PST by naturalman1975

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: naturalman1975

The 1st Ammendment of the U.S. Constitution doesn’t protect the free speech of Australian children.

However, this is so typical Clinton/left behaviour to censor other people’s opinions even if they asked for them!


21 posted on 01/23/2013 8:15:07 PM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

leftists do not like the idea of freedom of thought


22 posted on 01/23/2013 9:00:03 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Certain parts (China, India, etc.) of the world are indeed overpopulated.


23 posted on 01/23/2013 9:04:15 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
The question is why would Hillary censor it. It isn’t like it is a heretical opinion on the left.

IMHO, Hillary had to. How else could they convince Americans to let 12+ million illegal immigrants stay here? How else would they get away with looking the other way while thirty million more come across the border in the next five to ten years? How else could they get away with sending more of our tax dollars to Africa to feed African children? How could they get away with letting people like Terry Turnage (he has 21 children by 15 women) and Desmond Hatchett (who has thirty children by 11 women) have children they can't pay for? We're talking about cutting into funds politicians can funnel into their pockets, and cutting their future voters.

I think humans are overpopulating the Earth, but, I sure as h&!! don't want to see a repeat of the 1970's. Back then there was a push for zero population growth but the only people who limited their children were those who should have had the most. The poor around the World kept having lots of children. Children they couldn't feed, so we who limited our offspring are forced to feed children who are not ours. It's unconscionable to force those who limited their children into taking care of the offspring of those with whom we disagree. We are being forced to care for children who will one day vote to take more from us and our children. Had I wanted to pay higher taxes for schools, parks..., I'd have had more of my own children to use them.

24 posted on 01/23/2013 10:59:07 PM PST by Razz Barry (Round'em up, send'em home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue
Children are the future of America

25 posted on 01/24/2013 12:53:46 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator
Hitler gave mothers medals for each child they bore even for stillborns. His demons hated mankind less than those of this age.


26 posted on 01/24/2013 1:08:38 AM PST by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson