To: NoLibZone
Biden says there is “no reasonable societal justification, or constitutional justification” for having a so called “assault rifle.” Oh really?
3 posted on
01/24/2013 2:25:37 PM PST by
Inyo-Mono
(My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
To: Inyo-Mono
There is no reasonable societal justification, or constitutional justification or moral justification for having Joe Biden either.
God, when I think of the child-like delight leftists used to have trashing Dan Quayle...
5 posted on
01/24/2013 2:36:26 PM PST by
VR-21
To: Inyo-Mono
I don't know, personally I thought this was a good enough reason - LA Riots, 1992:
I'm reasonably certain this shopowner would agree.
6 posted on
01/24/2013 2:47:19 PM PST by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Inyo-Mono
Who would have sat out the last election had they known Great Leader’s first order of business would have been an assault on the Second Amendment?
11 posted on
01/24/2013 3:05:54 PM PST by
AD from SpringBay
(We deserve the government we allow.)
To: Inyo-Mono
Have Joe ask those Korean merchants that protected their property during the Rodney King riots. A shot gun at distance is much less intimidating than a AK or AR15! Plus there is a big difference in being able to fire six to eight rounds with a time consuming reload versus 30 rounds with a rapid magazine change. Biden continues to prove an inability to think logically, I guess that’s why he is lying plagiarist.
12 posted on
01/24/2013 3:11:32 PM PST by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson