Skip to comments.
D.C. Man Who Used Gun to Save Kid from Dog Mauling May Be Charged
NewsBusters ^
Posted on 01/24/2013 6:21:27 PM PST by chessplayer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: chessplayer
2
posted on
01/24/2013 6:23:38 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: chessplayer
He saves a child and his property line is an issue?
No good deed goes unpunished.
3
posted on
01/24/2013 6:25:31 PM PST
by
KittenClaws
(You may have to fight a battle more than once in order to win it." - Margaret Thatcher)
To: Jim Robinson
My grandson is the same age as that boy. I hope that, if he’s ever endangered, there will be someone like that man around to help!
4
posted on
01/24/2013 6:26:44 PM PST
by
knittnmom
(Save the earth! It's the only planet with chocolate!)
To: chessplayer
Gwendolyn Crump said Wednesday that the entire case, including whether the man legally owned the gun he used to kill the dog, is under investigation. The police reacted correctly and the lawyers have to research a way to rail road this guy.
5
posted on
01/24/2013 6:36:47 PM PST
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: chessplayer
The only criminals in DC are public employees.
6
posted on
01/24/2013 7:02:24 PM PST
by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
To: chessplayer
the boy was also shot in the foot.I wonder which well-trained individual shot the kid's foot.
7
posted on
01/24/2013 7:25:23 PM PST
by
TangoLimaSierra
(To the left the truth looks like Right-Wing extremism.)
To: chessplayer
We’ll see. The political heat will be volcanic of they try to send this guy to prison. Most likely, they will try to get him on a reduced charge of some sort. I hope he stands his ground. At the bare minimum, it demonstrates that without the ability to keep and bear arms, this boy would probably be dead.
8
posted on
01/24/2013 7:35:32 PM PST
by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: chessplayer
The asterisk should have discussed how Feinstein carried a gun while mayor of San Francisco, when nobody else in San Francisco was allowed. Much more telling hypocrisy, in my opinion, than her showboating today.
9
posted on
01/24/2013 7:48:41 PM PST
by
Flightdeck
(My four children have been robbed)
To: chessplayer
If I was that guy I’d claim to be David Gregory.
10
posted on
01/24/2013 9:06:58 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Enterprise
Well see. The political heat will be volcanic of they try to send this guy to prison.
If he’s the one who shot the kid in the foot, he’s toast. The left will crucify him.
To: chessplayer
This is the crap that will hopefully help the pro 2A crowd.
12
posted on
01/24/2013 9:53:08 PM PST
by
matt04
To: chessplayer
Any of the dogs were capable of very quickly crushing the boy’s throat. In such a wild melee, the man was in a desperate situation as well as the boy. There could not possibly be time for measured, well aimed shots. But your point is valid. The left would say, “What difference does it make? He shot the boy in the foot.”
13
posted on
01/24/2013 9:56:02 PM PST
by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: Enterprise
"Most likely, they will try to get him on a reduced charge of some sort. I hope he stands his ground. At the bare minimum, it demonstrates that without the ability to keep and bear arms, this boy would probably be dead." I am willing to bet no matter what he will lose his right to own a gun in the USA. The powers that be will see to it.
Also it will be interesting to see whose bullet/round ended up in the kids foot. And since its not been reported yet I say it was the "well trained" LEO. Which is going to be a severe embarrassment to the "Only Government Trained Lackeys should be allowed guns in the USA" crowd.
14
posted on
01/24/2013 10:05:14 PM PST
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: Mad Dawgg
When do we move against the tyranny we supposedly own guns to prevent?
15
posted on
01/24/2013 10:10:20 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
"When do we move against the tyranny we supposedly own guns to prevent?" First Tuesday in November.
16
posted on
01/24/2013 10:13:00 PM PST
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: Jim Robinson
These are laws passed by liberals, idiocy is a given.
To: Jim Robinson
Nope. This is good news. We need a hero as a martyr. Let’s set up a defense fund. I’m in for $100. Take this case to the American people and all the way to SCOTUS.
18
posted on
01/25/2013 4:14:22 AM PST
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: 1010RD
I’m in. Anyone else want to step up for our side?
Please ping us if and when a fund is set up.
To: Max in Utah
20
posted on
01/25/2013 5:24:25 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson