[KittenClaws]

If some women can actually perform as men without the standards being lowered, and it did not involve a draft of...shall I say, women who understand they are women, I have no problem with this.

If feminists and lesbians can really DO the job of men, go for it. But leave the real women out of it. Lowered standards does not a soldier make.

As for me, this is a deflection story.

[One Name]

Too many “ifs”.

I am opposed to this, wholesale, but they need to carry the concept to it’s linear conclusion.

Should we combat train enlisted/commissioned women? Yes.

Should you teach your daughters to fight and shoot? Yes.

Should we entertain women and children and old men as frontline troops? No. Last Resort Only.

[cherry]

women are women for a reason, and men are men for a reason...a men could no more out do a women in her role anymore than a woman could out do a man...GENERALLY speaking...of course, there are always a few exceptions, but very very few....

this is going to get ugly when they try to draft women in the same numbers as men, and believe me, we will have a draft....

and sending young women into combat battle and having them killed in massive numbers will surely be the final death of our culture...

not to say that killing of young men is great, but is somewhat expected for the men to be the warriors...its not expected of young women...

my prediction is that we will have a draft because we're going to have war...