Skip to comments.
Court: Obama recess appointments unconstitutional
The Washington Times ^
| January 25, 2013
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 01/25/2013 8:31:20 AM PST by yoe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
01/25/2013 8:31:23 AM PST
by
yoe
To: yoe
I smell a new Czar....no approval needed.
To: Sacajaweau
Quoting the entire article out of the Washington Post is a no no.
3
posted on
01/25/2013 8:34:02 AM PST
by
TheConservator
("I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men.")
To: yoe
His Highness isn’t going to like this. How dare mere mortals defy his divine will?
4
posted on
01/25/2013 8:35:29 AM PST
by
IronJack
(=)
To: yoe
Anybody want to start a betting pool on how long it will take before Pennsylvania’s nitwit senior senator Bob Casey, Jr. comes out in favor of allowing Der Furhrer to make appointments without congressional approval just as he wants him to be able to unilaterally extend the debt ceiling?
5
posted on
01/25/2013 8:36:24 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: yoe
There can only be one of two outcomes regarding this. Either Obama will simply ignore the judges, or he’ll do an end around and shift the power where he wants it to be.
There is no stopping Obama with a weak opposition, and an MSM that is willing to do ANYTHING to cover for him.
6
posted on
01/25/2013 8:38:06 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: IronJack
His Highness isnt going to like this. Yep - wonder how long it's been since those judges had their taxes audited... and their kid's taxes...
7
posted on
01/25/2013 8:40:33 AM PST
by
grobdriver
(Sic semper tyrannis!)
To: yoe
nlrb has instant problems. the cpb has instant problems . . . what else?
8
posted on
01/25/2013 8:42:55 AM PST
by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: yoe
I can see the CNN-MSNBC-NY Times-The View spin already -
“Court lynches black President - welcome to the new Jim Crow”
or
“Racist court refuses to allow black President to do his job”
etc. etc., you get the idea .....
To: yoe
If only they would dive into BO’s background like they did in this instance we could be rid of him completely.
10
posted on
01/25/2013 8:46:15 AM PST
by
oust the louse
("When capitalism disintegrates, socialism ceases to have any validity or justification.”)
To: yoe
This will be appealed by the Regime to the Supreme Court. Obama just needs one more leftist just on the SC to stop these troublesome judicial impediments. If I were one of the conservatives on the SC, I would hire a food taster.
11
posted on
01/25/2013 8:49:08 AM PST
by
Truth29
To: Sacajaweau
"I smell a new Czar....no approval needed."
Exactly! There is NO WAY O'Bummer is going to let a few judges get in his way - Torpedo the Constitution and full speed ahead!!!
12
posted on
01/25/2013 8:49:08 AM PST
by
The Louiswu
(Torpedo the Constitution and full speed ahead!!!)
To: yoe
Everything about the turd is unconstitutional..
13
posted on
01/25/2013 8:50:28 AM PST
by
cardinal4
(Constitution? What Constitution?)
To: cardinal4
To: yoe
To: IronJack
His Highness isnt going to like this. How dare mere mortals defy his divine will?
Nah. Not to worry. He'll just tell his personal boy on the Supreme Court, Johnny Roberts, to take care of it. Nobody puts a pair of knee pads to better use than Johnny Roberts.
To: brownsfan
So any rulings would be void?
To: yoe
Another crisis followed by a dog and pony show,
smug MSM and end of case.
18
posted on
01/25/2013 8:59:53 AM PST
by
two23
(My Dad said they were all commies back in the 60's. He was right.)
To: yoe; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; NFHale; BillyBoy; ...
Wow, they couldnt rule on this till after the election?
19
posted on
01/25/2013 9:03:06 AM PST
by
sickoflibs
(Losing to Dems and Obama is not a principle! Its just losing.)
To: IronJack
No one will do jack diddly about it.
The appointments will stand, because no one wants to actually confront him on it.
20
posted on
01/25/2013 9:05:59 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson