Implications of the decision are still being sorted out. One potential result raised immediately was that by invalidating the labor board appointments, the decision may have effectively invalidated all the board’s work since they were made, including orders and regulations issued. The NLRB and the White House expressed confidence that this would not happen. “This court decision does not effect this operation, their ability to function,” Carney said.TRANSLATION: We're going to completely ignore the federal court and proceed as planned.The decision also puts into question the appointment of Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. That appointment was made at the same time as the NLRB appointments.
Carney said it also argued that the decision will have “no bearing” on Cordray, adding “It simply doesn’t as a legal matter.”
Because no one can stop us.
The administrations response to any challenge is now: "What difference does it make?"
Yep, I knew this would be the reaction.
They’ll ignore the ruling,
because no one WILL stop them.
No one will step up and enforce this decision.
Actually all businesses can just not abide by any of the 216 rulings and tell the shop steward he will be fired for insubordination if he raises a row
It is not required to obey a rule that isn’t