First, do no harm. Cathay has no intention of being miliantly cruel to gays. In the image and likeness of God, we were all created and through Him have human dignity. Cathay serves chicky and chips to gays with the same human respect as he would any other customer, and supports charitable actions where gays are actually known to support the same charity also, is more likely the truth.
Cathay has declined to support political agendas that are militantly anti-gay. He does oppose gay behavior and we all know that.
Er, MOST of us know that.
So now you are saying being against gay marriage is, “militantly cruel to gays.” In 2009 he was giving money to those who are, “militantly cruel to gays,” but he had a revelation by 2011 that depriving gays of marriage was wrong, so he stopped. So, Ronald Reagan was , “militantly cruel to gays.” Even President Obama, until May 2012, was, “militantly cruel to gays.” So, Dan Cathy is to the left of where President Obama was a year ago today.
“Don Cathy has declined to support political agendas that are militantly anti-gay”
Who are you calling militant? Militantly anti-gay? Who? The Pope? People quoting the Bible? Billy Graham and his groups?
Why do you insult pro-marriage groups like that? It sounds like Don Cathy and Chick-Fil-A management are chickening out, to coin a phrase. Sad.
Militantly anti-gay? What is that? By “militantly,” do you mean with integrity, or using deadly force? By “gay” do you mean happy, or engaging in homosexual activity?
Most conservatives wouldn’t describe homosexual behavior as happy and gay. Most conservatives wouldn’t describe righteous opposition to the militant homosexual agenda as militant.