Just a couple of things not in the article that people should note:
1. One of the comments under the article says the gun was pointed at the baby but the article doesn’t. The picture is not available.
2. There is no mention of the mother. None.
3. I joked about the mother-in-law. She may in fact just be the Baby’s Mama’s Mama.
http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_west_cincinnati/colerain/man-arrested-after-posting-photo-of-self-holding-1-year-old-and-bb-gun
http://www.wlwt.com/news/local-news/hamilton-county/Man-arrested-after-posting-FB-photo-with-baby-gun/-/13550662/18305226/-/10crb1l/-/index.html?absolute=true
Not married.
It appears to be available see post #46. It is NOT pointing at the kid.