[Zeneta]

Worms are still worms

Plants are still plants

Fish are still fish.

Can evolutionist account for the new information (read DNA) required to move a “simple” life form to a more complex one ?

[stormer]

Here's one common method - happens to me a couple of times a year (and you too, I suppose).

[muawiyah]

The easy way to do that is to accept the fact that DNA is heavily invested in self assembly technology ~ and that it's the DNA itself that's life, not the critters it churns out.

Whether DNA churns up a Brown Fish or a White Bear has no bearing whatsoever on the mechanism of self-assembly. Sexual reproduction has mechanisms, themselves, self assembled in some fashion, that correct errors in coding at the time of reproduction and thereby FIGHT BACK against the process mistakenly called 'evolution' ~ presumably the self assembled protective mechanisms change through time ~ and can fix errors differently thereby leading to entirely diferent critters.

You have to get beyond Darwin's mistake of accepting the gradualist premise of the geologists of his time. if you dope a chip base a tad different you get an entirely different chip with different capacitances ~ the premise should apply to DNA rebuilds in mieosis as well.