Skip to comments.Obama: Boy Scouts Should Expose Homosexuals to Opportunities
Posted on 02/04/2013 10:37:31 PM PST by Nachum
(CNSNews.com) - One day after President Obama said "yes," he thinks the Boy Scouts of America should admit homosexuals -- to expose them to "opportunities and leadership" -- dozens of conservative groups are running a newspaper ad, urging the Boy Scouts to "show courage" and "stand for timeless values."
The 41 conservative organizations, in a full-page ad in Monday's USA Today, said it would be a "grave mistake" for BSA to change their longstanding policy against having openly homosexual Scout leaders or Scouts.
In a Sunday interview with "60 Minutes" Correspondent Scott Pelley, President Obama said the scouts should admit homosexuals:
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
I hear that Pops, the Pakistani buddy and the boys at Man Country exposed him to quite a few things.
You can email the scouts’ leader at Wayne.Brock@Scouting.org
There, fixed it.
BUMP a great title!
An unintentional reveal.
The whole idea behind BSA policy of excluding homosexual scoutmasters is to deny them “opportunities” to “expose” themselves to young scouts.
Oh man....I was going to quote Dave Berry and you beat me to it.
Muslim males go after young boys, so Hussein’s action is par for the course.
You can’t blame Odumbo.
He was humped...er, I mean “Raised” by the only known homo musloom while growing up in Indonesia, no joke. To add, his bathhouse antics with Rahm and Reggie Love turned him into a fudgepacker himself.
And wasn’t his early Communist “mentor”, Frank Marshall Davis, queer?
Wow! Seems more like Homosexuals are looking for an opportunity to expose themselves to Boyscouts.
I caught the double entendre and gave its proper form...
A bunch of gay dudes surrounded by little boys, gee what could possibly go wrong *Cough* Sandusky *Cough*
He/she is STILL trying to make his case to the SS bangin' wookie.
Isn't it amazing how that dissaparated from the Internet?
We, the undersigned organizations, urge the Boy Scouts of America to make no changes in national membership standards.
To the Boy Scouts of America:
Alaska Family Action
American Civil Rights Union
American Family Association American Values
Bott Radio Network
Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute
Center for Arizona Policy Center for Military Readiness
Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty
Christian Civic League of Maine Citizens for Community Values
Concerned Women for America
Cornerstone Action Family Foundation of Virginia
Family Institute of Connecticut
Family Research Council
Florida Family Policy Council High Impact Leadership
Coalition Illinois Family
Institute International Communion of Evangelical Churches
Kansas Family Policy Council
Liberty Counsel Louisiana Family Forum
Massachusetts Family Institute
Media Research Center Minnesota
Family Council New Hope Foundation
New Jersey Family Policy Council
New Yorkers Family Research Foundation
Oak Initiative Ohio Faith and Freedom Coalition
Palmetto Family Alliance
Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays
Patriot Voices Psalm 103
Foundation Public Interest Institute
The Family Leader
The Family Policy Council of West Virginia
Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission Wisconsin Family Action
CALL THE BOY SCOUTS AT 972-580-2000
AND TELL THEM NOT TO CHANGE THEIR MEMBERSHIP STANDARDS
Homosexuals growing up find they have all the opportunities they can handle. They don’t need to be handed more.
When this society is fully homosexualized the women who are at the forefront of the campaign will find that real female women, homosexual or straight have been pushed out into thepasture to become breed stock and slaves. That is the shape of pagan homosexual society as in ancient Greece and modern (such as it is) Afghanistan and other Moslem countries and most Western antecedent societies outside of the Mosaic tradition.
If only the Dunhams had him in scouts we may not be headed on the fast track to becoming a third world.
Odumbo is upset that he was rejected by the Boy Scouts because of his lifestyle back then and now is doing his best to get them to change their “constitution” too.
What Obama and the gay-lobby don’t get is that the Scouts aren’t about sex. They aren’t even offering “public accomodation” to anyone seeking services (like the baker who didn’t want to make a lesbian wedding cake). What good is the right to “freedom of association” if there also isn’t the right to exclude certain people whose avowed interests run counter to that of the associating group?
Would Obama want someone who had a known interest in young women working for the girl-scouts? Maybe it’s silly of me to ask.
“muslims love symbolism, so it is no accident zero paired the word expose to the word homosexual.”
You notice how silent the administration has been on this epidemic?
“Afghan Pedophilia: A way of life, say U.S. soldiers and journalists”
“...Why is there hesitation on the part of Obama, Clinton, Panetta and others to discuss the widespread sexual assault of male children in Afghanistan? Could it be that it is politically incorrect to discuss any immoral and unlawful behavior on the part of Muslims? It’s quite evident that U.S. politicians may bash Christians without fear of adverse effects on their political careers. But these same leaders will behave as if they are walking on egg shells to avoid even the hint of criticizing Muslims...”
If it would be absurd to have a male scout leader in charge of a bunch of pre-teen girls on a camping trip because he’s a male that is attracted to females,
seriously, how can the left justify putting a male in charge of a bunch of pre-teen boys when he’s attracted to males?
I know, I know... the only consistency of the left is that they further their attack on the Judaeo-Christian institutions in our society.
I never could understand why this was even an issue. Sexual deviancy, no matter if wanting to sodomize boys or sheep or dog or goats, would be tolerated by an organization that works with children. How in our world can someone be called anything but sexually deviant that does such a thing and still expect to participate with children?