May not have acted alone in a prosecutorial statement?
Politics are involved.
Assume what you will, but IMHO, there was more than one person involved or the report would not be witheld. The democrat liberal fascists are writting the report and it goes against what the facts are in the investigation in still sealed documents.
Its a question of reality choice. And the dems live ion a Utopia, and will deny anything that does not support that Utopia.Investigative work does NOT work that way.
“May not have acted alone,” is political double speak required by the liberal fascist culture now predominant in our country.It means the perpetator did not act alone.
“May not have acted alone in a prosecutorial statement?”
Means the same thing it means in most any context in the English language. If they wanted to say that he didn’t act alone, they would say he didn’t act alone. It’s basic grammar, not rocket science.
“And the dems live ion a Utopia, and will deny anything that does not support that Utopia.Investigative work does NOT work that way.
“May not have acted alone,” is political double speak required by the liberal fascist culture now predominant in our country.It means the perpetator did not act alone.”
If you can’t see the glaring contradiction inherent in those two sentences, then I think you’ve got more to worry about than Sandy Hook.