Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe

Yes. Well at least for the country that puts its women in combat. Once you loose a war or two real bad, you don’t have a country to defend anymore.

Therefore, no more war for that country. One less country that can go to war could possibly mean less wars.


4 posted on 02/06/2013 1:25:32 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Pray for revival. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blue Collar Christian

“The opposite of war isn’t peace. It’s slavery.” - Capt. James T. Kirk


5 posted on 02/06/2013 1:27:58 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Collar Christian
Yes. Well at least for the country that puts its women in combat.....

It seems that you summed up all of the main points rather nicely.

7 posted on 02/06/2013 1:28:35 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Collar Christian
Once you loose a war or two real bad...

I will finish that thought a bit more concisely for you, young fellar: "Once you loose a war or two real bad --and let loose the Dogs of War, whosoever was on the receiving end of such utter woe is henceforth deemed to be unworthy of any further dissuasion, as he will be in grievous pain and therefore unwilling to initiate any further difficulties lest he be afflicted with yet more sorrows."

You can "qote" that if you like. (Yes, the misspelling is intentional)

36 posted on 02/06/2013 4:08:22 PM PST by Utilizer (What does not kill you... -can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson