California Judge Does The Unthinkable: Reinstates Obama Eligibility Lawsuit

http://www.scribd.com/doc/124071908/Taitz-v-Obama-Judge-O-Leary-s-Order-Reinstating-Obama-Eligibility-Case-2-4-2013 ^

[Nero Germanicus]

What was Richard Nixon pardoned for? He was only named by the Watergate Grand Jury as an “unindicted co-conspirator.” He had not been tried or convicted of anything.
When a president issues a full pardon, it covers all contingencies. When George H.W. Bush pardoned former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger it was before Mr. Weinberger even had gone on trial in Iran-Contra. The pardon stopped the trial cold.
If Obama was in serious legal jeopardy, he would resign the office (my preferred way to get rid of him) and he would accept a full pardon for any and all crimes that he may have committed from his successor just as Nixon did.

[Huskerfan44]

Orly:
Success = “DO IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME”

[Huskerfan44]

What if you added valid DNA?

[Scooter100]

Just like all the other judges who initially recognized the issue as legitimate, this judge will do the same; in few days this judge will have a whole new perspective on the issue and declare it lacks merit. Of course Bruno from Chicago will have first visited this judge but that will never be revealed either.

You are right. Bribes and threats can be most pesuasive.

Even a "principled person" would have to do some serious thinking if a large amount of money was offered. A hefty bribe can fix a lot of life's problems....cure ill relatives, send children to college, replace a leaking roof, new cars, paying off debt, etc. The larger the bribe, the harder it would be to refuse.

Verbal threats, of course, could be dismissed. But violent and demonstrative threats...like your car burned, bricks through your windows, children approached, or your dog nailed to your front door, etc., would cause one to seriously stop and think if it was really worth it.

This is how the NSDAP (the Nazi Party) established itself... rule with an iron fisted group of brownshirts "explaining things" to the good townsfolk.

Not sure how I would respond, without actually being put in the situation.

[David]

To your #81:

You may think all that stuff—you are welcome to think whatever you like but most of that is simply incorrect.

[Revolting cat!]

Yes, Bruno’s been busy lately, having lunches with the Chief SC Justice of the US, writing IOUs to Hildegarde, little time for the kiddies and the little lady in Chi-town.

[Brown Deer]

Thanks for sharing your very informative expertise with us.

[drypowder]

offers one can’t refuse: take the silver or you’ll get the lead. Corruption rules and this current government is as corrupt as it can possibly get.

[Lurking Libertarian]

When this lawsuit is bounced, it will have nothing to do with any threats or corruption. The lawsuit was dismissed because Orly never served the defendants, about as basic a mistake as can be made. No service=no lawsuit.

Orly tried to appeal, but the appeal was bounced because she couldn't properly fill out the paperwork to file a case in the Court of Appeal. (She actually messed up this simple paperwork twice.) The exciting victory you are celebrating is the Court of Appeal giving Orly a third chance to file the paperwork. If she gets it right the third time (doubtful), she will get the right to file a brief, but the appeal is still a guaranteed loser because you can't have a lawsuit if you don't serve the defendants.

[JohnnyP]

Why don’t you give her a hand?

[DrDude]

I don;t understand your premise that there was no service and thus no case. If this Orly person is appealing the case then a decision has been made. Courts don’t make decisions on cases that do not exist. It seems in the current matter that a Judge made a written decision and listed reasons. If the service was deficient, then it would have been dismissed without comment. I doubt the court opened the appeal so “proper service” could be determined.

I don’t think this Orly has a chance in hell. She seems ill prepared and doesn’t know how to file basic paperwork. I doubt her actual appeal will be arguing service if the case never started.

[Lurking Libertarian]

Yes, a case was started (i.e., Orly filed one), but she never succeeded in serving any of the defendants properly. That was one of the reasons the judge gave in his written decision for dismissing the case. There were other reasons as well, but because there was no valid service the appeal has zero chance of succeeding.