Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

“How can you win a war when the other side is using bazookas and your side is using fly swatters?”

“The weapons of political campaigns are hope and fear.” “Obama won the presidency in 2008 on a campaign of hope; he won re-election in 2012 on a campaign of fear.”- David Horowitz

1 posted on 02/07/2013 8:01:16 AM PST by CharlesMartelsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CharlesMartelsGhost

America, land of the free(loader).

What a legacy from Dear Leader.


2 posted on 02/07/2013 8:07:33 AM PST by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost
Millions of voters just couldn't decide between Romney or King Obama and just let the King have it. Just mostly unhappy children that never grew up and couldn't see that their precious pride got in the way. So enjoy!
3 posted on 02/07/2013 8:22:02 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

The answer lies somewhere in between. The R’s have had their stones removed and are deathly afraid to tell the truth about bam and the left out of fear for offending someone. If they actually started doing that unashamedly it would help.
On the other hand, too many people are low information or willfully ignorant and do only care about getting their check. These people can be brought to a harsh reality. At least many of them.


4 posted on 02/07/2013 8:23:22 AM PST by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost
"“The only way to confront the emotional campaign that Democrats wage in every election is through an equally emotional campaign that puts the aggressors on the defensive; that attacks them in the same moral language, identifying them as the bad guys.” "

Yep.

One set of messages for rational thinkers and another set of emotional ones (consistent with conservative principles, but beating the k|~ @ |) out of 'rats).

5 posted on 02/07/2013 8:53:18 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

Why would anyone expect a different result than what happened?

Especially when our nominee was a two-faced liar, who supported both the Gay Agenda and Abortion for Rape, Incest, Life and HEALTH of the Mother, and who lied about being a conservative.

Tell me, why would you expect any other outcome when your base, conservatives, actually have a brain and principles?

He did his best to alienate the GOP base to get the votes of moderates.

We can cry in our beer, so to speak, about how unfair the media and the Democrats are, and that there was massive cheating, but even with those facts, it still does not remove the fact that our guy, was a defective product.


8 posted on 02/07/2013 9:02:56 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

Obama&Co won both ‘08 and ‘12 through effective community organizing. He may be an incompetent president. But Obama&Co are clearly very competent at community organizing.

Our mistake is in ceding community organizing to them.

Like a gun or knife or any tool, the community organizing tool possesses no inherent morality. The morality is in how it is used. But our side has labeled the tool immoral.

Thus we fight unarmed.


10 posted on 02/07/2013 9:07:19 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

Republicans find it difficult to speak harshly towards or critically of Democrats, because they want to be like Democrats. But, when it comes to Republicans attacking other Republicans, the gloves are off, because Republicans don’t want to be like other Republicans, and they want the world to know it. This isn’t anything new, despite the town criers who want us to believe that the war within the ranks has just started. It’s an old, bloody war with the same nuanced debates, ad nauseam. Goldwater despised the religious right, saw them as the bane of conservative success. Reagan and Newt understood the religious right, and motivated them, to the deep displeasure of the GOP establishment. The South could have been turned to the Republican Party long before Reagan and before the 94 elections, if only the Republican Party had embraced the conservatives there. We might have avoided 40 years of Democrat rule in Congress. Demographics have changed, but the foolishness stays the same, the Tea Party having replaced the despised religious right at the bargaining table.


13 posted on 02/07/2013 10:36:19 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost
It's difficult to unseat a sitting president, Jimmy Carter being an obvious exception but it's even more difficult to do when the opposing party chooses the worst possible candidate to try it.
15 posted on 02/07/2013 11:26:56 AM PST by Graybeard58 (_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson