Skip to comments.Two Cheers For Rebranding
Posted on 02/08/2013 7:20:28 AM PST by Kaslin
Ever since Mitt Romney lost the presidential election, there's been a lot of talk about how the Republican Party needs to "rebrand" itself.
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal wants, among other things, for the GOP to stop being "the stupid party." Rep. Paul Ryan has concluded that the watchword for the Republican Party needs to be "prudence." Sen. Marco Rubio is the front man for the most tangible aspect of the rebranding effort: getting on the right side of the immigration issue. In the process, he's become something of the de facto point person for the party.
The latest entrant into this effort: House Majority leader Eric Cantor. On Tuesday, Cantor gave a well-received speech at the American Enterprise Institute (where I am a fellow), titled "Making Life Work." In it, Cantor argued for utterly reasonable conservative solutions that would improve the plight of the working poor and the middle class.
It's all good stuff from a great field. Indeed, while calling them the "fantastic four" might seem hyperbolic -- and unfair to a few other politicians left out of the mix -- Rubio, Ryan, Jindal and Cantor are a pretty good counterargument to those who think the Republican Party is doomed. Excellent politicians all, three out of four are minorities: a Hispanic, an Indian-American, and a Jew -- which sounds like they should be walking into a bar for a joke. The fourth, the Catholic Ryan, routinely wins a working-class district that votes Democratic in presidential elections.
I should note that lately I've written favorably about this rebranding stuff as well. In a nutshell, I've been arguing that the GOP's problems don't stem from a lack of principle, but from a lack of persuasiveness.
My point was not -- and is not -- that the GOP should abandon its commitment to core conservative principles. If you can't get the swing voters to vote for the existing level of conservatism the GOP is offering, it seems odd to argue that the GOP needs to peddle an even more strident form of conservatism (even if that purer conservatism would yield better policies). If a potential customer says, "The Chevy Impala is too pricey," a good salesman doesn't immediately respond, "OK, can I interest you in a Bentley?"
All that said, I think the push to rebrand the GOP has its own pitfalls.
For starters, "prudence" and "don't be stupid," while excellent prescriptions for how to behave, are not, in themselves, great rallying cries. If you don't believe me, try to get a crowd of the faithful to start chanting "Pru-dence! Pru-dence!" or "We're Not Stupid! We're Not Stupid!"
While this may seem obvious, the fact is that one GOP's worst tics is its habit of reading its stage directions out loud. For instance, Republicans often talk about how they're not going to "go negative." George H.W. Bush had such contempt for Bill Clinton's gift for wholesale empathy, he felt the need to proclaim, "Message: I care."
Obviously, Republicans should care about what is best for the country and the voters -- and they should demonstrate that concern -- but they will never beat liberals at the game of whose heart bleeds the most. As liberal Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne observes, Cantor's rebranding maneuvers the GOP into a contest on Democratic turf: who cares more about workers, the poor, immigrants, etc. As Dionne notes, that's why Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer immediately praised Cantor's remarks.
The reason that game is so perilous for conservatives is not that liberals necessarily care more than conservatives but that they are always willing and eager to prove their concern by cutting a check, even when all we have in the checking account is IOUs and cash on loan from China. Moreover, they are perfectly happy and eager to say that anyone who opposes more check-kiting is greedy or selfish, even if what Democrats are doing is making the problem they seek to solve worse. All too often, liberals act as if government has a monopoly on compassion.
"There is always a certain meanness in the argument of conservatism," Ralph Waldo Emerson famously said, "joined with a certain superiority in its fact." Children often think their parents are being mean when they tell their kids to do their homework. That doesn't make the parents mean, it makes them responsible. Eventually, the lessons of life persuade children their parents were right all along.
Voters aren't children, but too many of them have the childish notion that the best policies are those that pander to their immediate desires. The challenge for the GOP is to persuade them to put away childish things.
Rubio is going to kill the GOP forever if he gets his way on immigration.
Go ahead and run more McCains and Romneys and you will keep getting the same result. The GOP should stop being surprised when they lose conservative voters for going left.
Blah, blah, blah
The Republicans need some people with balls that will stand up to Reid, Pelosi and Obama. “Prudence”? How about screaming that Obama is a pos lying idiot?
Pubbies fight with a wet noodle and the dems use an AK-47.
Just a slight disagreement. The GOP can be the party with more of a bleeding heart, if they truly cared that democrats are talking of killing the elderly with death panels.
But republicans are fools.
Have no fear. Karl Rove's white board will save the party.
Why do Conservatives insist on fielding ‘Ozzie and Harriet’ candidates with NO relevance to the current American lifestyle or the mind-set of the Conservative base.
Conservatism (especially within the Tea Party-it’s MOST definitive expression) is more coherent, articulate and consistent than the GOP has been for a long time. Meanwhile, the GOP has its heels dug in on issues the true Conservatives have long since clarified for the record!
True Conservatives regard the GOP as a moribund relic and it's disconnect is more apparent all the time.
</s> (Did I really need the tag?)
Yes, the death panels and make them eat their own anti-constitutional words and activities. For one - demanding an end to the freedom of speech in the name of not offending Islam, which is called Sharia in foreign nations; and the other, demanding an end to the second amendment’s guarentee of self defense. They want America’s constitutional submission to Islam and to criminals.
My additional concern is that he's been factored and is now working for Karl Rove and the Business Roundtable types.
Exactly. Placing a ‘New and Improved’ sticker on a white dog turd doesn’t change what it is, no matter if it has an (R) after it’s name or not!
Attn GOP: Those are called PRINCIPLES. Learn ‘em, live ‘em, follow ‘em, vote ‘em and I just might vote for YOU.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.