Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie
The cops DO have a right to protect themselves from a potential deadly threat.

Shooting unarmed people in the back? Emptying their weapons on an unseen target? Three unarmed victims so far -

You wouldn't be a cop by any chance, would you?

146 posted on 02/09/2013 8:56:14 AM PST by ladyjane (For the first time in my life I am not proud of my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: ladyjane
Shooting unarmed people in the back? Emptying their weapons on an unseen target?

I don't think I approved of these.


In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Searchers struggle to pick up trail of former Los Angeles cop wanted in killing spree, ladyjane wrote: The cops DO have a right to protect themselves from a potential deadly threat. Shooting unarmed people in the back? Emptying their weapons on an unseen target? Three unarmed victims so far - You wouldn't be a cop by any chance, would you?

You've outted me; as my daughter is married to a very fine one.

AFAIK, he's never had to shoot his weapon during a run; although he was in a SWAT unit early in his career.

156 posted on 02/09/2013 10:21:22 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson