Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LSUfan
Let’s leave aside for now the insulting, utterly asinine, sickening, inexcusable use of the phrase “war caucus” to describe those (including Reagan!) who supported the mujaheddin against the Soviets. That word choice alone is almost entirely disqualifying for its purveyor to ever be president.

****************************

The author does make a rather good point here.

19 posted on 02/09/2013 1:38:36 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: trisham

>> “The author does make a rather good point here.” <<

.
If he does, it is sure buried deep.

The war caucus includes those that are “All war all the time.” They have done us massive disservice at every juncture. The foolish nature of our adventure to embarrass the Soviets is certainly evident now, isn’t it?


22 posted on 02/09/2013 1:52:09 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson