Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FlJoePa

The statements are not contradictory. They asked to interview Paterno, he said, (through his lawyer) he was willing to talk but not now.

Yet he had no problem interviewing with Sally Jenkins at that same time, also with a biographer.

Once again JoePa turned his back on Sandusky’s victims in order to try and protect his “legacy”.


133 posted on 02/10/2013 3:43:33 PM PST by free me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: free me; FlJoePa
Yet he had no problem interviewing with Sally Jenkins at that same time, also with a biographer. Once again JoePa turned his back on Sandusky’s victims in order to try and protect his “legacy”.

(Interesting that the Joepologists somehow fail to mention this)

135 posted on 02/10/2013 3:45:10 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: free me
They asked to interview Paterno, he said, (through his lawyer) he was willing to talk but not now. Yet he had no problem interviewing with Sally Jenkins at that same time, also with a biographer.

And yet that isn't what Freeh put in his report nor is it what he stated in his presser. He said they weren't able to interview Paterno prior to his death although he expressed willingness. Did Paterno defer the interview until later or did Freeh's team, or was it simply a matter of timing? It doesn't seem that any of us can say with certainty.

139 posted on 02/10/2013 4:01:59 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson