Posted on 02/11/2013 5:22:42 PM PST by SeekAndFind
One has to serve for twenty years before being eligible for a military pension. It’s not at all clear from the article as to why the ‘Shooter’ retired sooner.
Yep
Too Far You Say?
Let's Remember This: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2An9Qch2pQ
Yes, for the most part since President Reagan left, it is. I wish he’d send me his resume, I’d find something for him. That’s what I did for the best part of 15 years at the unemployment office.
After getting bin Laden, there’s nothing left to do in that line of work but get killed.
Since the end of World War II, America has typically either ignored its heroes or crapped on them.
They’ll get a better reception in heaven when the time comes (may it not be soon), where good works are unfailingly rewarded.
Yes, though I would say he didn’t retire, he just resigned. And since you’re not eligible for an active duty pension before serving 20 years, he chose his fate.
He probably could’ve taken some paper-pushing clerk-type job for the remaining four years, but apparently he chose not to — why not?
On the other hand I have an aquaintance who has a “zero percent” military disability, and because he lives in CA his kids will go to college for free, paid for by CA.
Doesn’t seem right.
“Exit question: How can the guy who shot Bin Laden not be eligible for military health insurance?”
First of all thanks for posting this article. You know the answer to your question. Pension eligibility is the same for all soldiers. Period. End of story. However it would seem the military should do something unofficially to offer protection in this case.
Although I’m grateful for his years of service, the rules clearly state 20 years of service is required for lifetime coverage and he only served 16. Was he informed of this? He should have been.
I really don’t understand why he quit 4 years too soon...
Why would special protection be in order? We don’t even know this guys name. If his name was released, thats one thing, but as long as its secret I don’t see a problem.
If he’d quit bellyaching to the media his name would more likely STAY a secret. And yes, I used the word “bellyaching”. We who were in the military all knew what the rules are. You stay in 20 years, you get the benefits. He decided to leave early. I’m not sure why he thinks he should be treated differently.
Simple, noticehow many Seals involvedin this raidare now dead.....
Amen to that.
Additionally can anyone explain why this task was publicly announced as being carried out by the seals?
I believe that was Biden that divulged that tidbit of information.
I’m a little skeptical.....when I left the Army there were job placement classes and a database of companies willing to hire ex-soldiers. You’d think the SEALS would be a tight knit group that helped each other find work in a similar fashion.
Also for some reason I envisioned the ‘shooter’ would be much younger. A guy with sixteen years in would be a squad leader type....not a point man.
From what I heard about the full article, it was family issues that prompted him leaving. We get these young dedicated tough men and we seem to imagine they will forego a family and it just rarely works out that way for more than a portion of them.
Traveling in business with only transitory postings is hard — traveling in “deadly” business would be impossibly hard on the other family memebers in many cases. If a 16 year fellow was 18 to 20 when he joined and his wife he meets in 3 years his junior, by the time he has in 16 years, she is either halfway through her child bearing years waiting or has a number of young kids with a father that is not there all that much. Tough all around.
Another strange story associated with bin Laden, the man with 9 lives. I’d like to know more about this situation in determining if we should be concerned about the general handling of ex-active military.
Ask Ira Hayes.
I think you are right about Biden making it known that the Seals carried out the assassination.
I am skeptical too, I question his claims of all the health issues. If he has numerous health issues I doubt he would have been the go to guy to begin with. He also should have been able to get medical retirement or at least in the process to try to medically retire he should have been awarded disability percentages to qualify for VA disability. Meaning his VA claims would have been done before he got out or close to it. Even if he didn’t qualify for disability he should be eligible for VA health care if he is indeed unemployed.
I wondered about your points too, he said he wasn’t interested in security work so can’t get a job- former SEALS work in many fields and many have their own businesses so their should be work opportunities in the SEAL community in many careers.
Sounds fishy and wouldn’t be the first time media has been played if he is not real.
He won't answer any more.
They did a great disservice to Ira Hayes and the other survivors of the group caught in the photo of the flagraisers when they were singled out and treated as heroes. They didn't feel any more deserving of the attention than of all the other Americans fighting and dying on Iwo Jima. They were all heroes, but those six just happened to be in the photograph. Without all that publicity, maybe Ira Hayes would have been more successful in readjusting to civilian life.
I mean no disrespect to Ira Hayes but the situations are not entirely comparable. Hayes was one of millions who served bravely in WWII, but he didn't have to worry about Japanese tracking him down in Arizona afterwards to try to kill him, in the way that the man who shot Bin Laden has to fear Al Qaeda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.