Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vette6387
It’s to get around the cost of US crews and more importantly, US inspections.

Which, of course, are geared towards union labor and overweening government nanniness which drive up the costs to the point that most of these people wouldn't be taking a cruise. There's a reason there aren't any lines with American-crewed ships.

There are some good ones, though. Holland-America and Cunard aren't bad, for example.

I remember my sister's first cruise in the eighties. She was so looking forward to it. It was Carnival. She's a foodie -- described it as a giant Shoney's with an ocean view.

79 posted on 02/12/2013 4:33:40 PM PST by BfloGuy (Money, like chocolate on a hot oven, was melting in the pockets of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: BfloGuy

“Which, of course, are geared towards union labor and overweening government nanniness which drive up the costs “

True, and I don’t like unions any more than you do. That said, the cruise ships evidently look at cost cutting over safety. I can’t imagine one of our Navy vessels being run like most of the cruise ships today. You’ve even got Captain Mario Hotpants, scheming on a woman while his ship is sinking over in Italy.


81 posted on 02/12/2013 8:20:26 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson