Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RetiredTexasVet

NFIP should be abolished entirely. If people want to build in flood plains, fine. But there’s no reason the American taxpayer should be on the hook for it.


3 posted on 02/12/2013 8:33:26 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

“NFIP should be abolished entirely. If people want to build in flood plains, fine. But there’s no reason the American taxpayer should be on the hook for it.”

If it is indeed an insurance policy, irrespective of who runs it, it should pay out per the policy’s prescribed limits. I suspect though, that with the government involved, it isn’t really a true “insurance policy” and whatever “premiums” the government has collected have already been spent on some politicians wet dream. Again, this is an area where the government should butt out. And I agree with you, there just isn’t any way the taxpayers should pay for someone’s losses here. Then again, I feel the same way about Katrina and New Orleans. If people want to live in a toilet bowl, they have to expect to get flushed down the drain occasionally.


4 posted on 02/12/2013 9:03:08 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson