Replies

What's your point, Joe? You've made it clear that you are convinced that you have proved that Obama is not a natural born citizen, not eligible to be President. And there's no doubt in your mind. You have proved it multiple times -- to your own satisfaction. You are completely certain of your correctness, and if you're the judge of your own case, you win.

On the other hand, not a single judicial or legislative decision-maker has come to the same conclusion in a case relating to Obama. You can pick and choose isolated phrases and pretend that they signal a minor point of agreement, but you can't deny the fact that none have reached the same conclusion as you. Not a single one. Nada. Zip.

To your way of thinking, your arguments are persuasive. To the thinking of all the others, they are not.

In your mind, your case is proved. In their minds, it is not. It is therefore undeniable that you have proven your case only in your own mind.

You've made it clear that you are convinced that you have proved that Obama is not a natural born citizen, not eligible to be President. And there's no doubt in your mind. You have proved it multiple times -- to your own satisfaction. You are completely certain of your correctness, and if you're the judge of your own case, you win. On the other hand, not a single judicial or legislative decision-maker has come to the same conclusion in a case relating to Obama. You can pick and choose isolated phrases and pretend that they signal a minor point of agreement, but you can't deny the fact that none have reached the same conclusion as you. Not a single one. Nada. Zip.

Sorry, but this excessive babbling is nothing more than a baseless denial. I just showed where Ankeny admitted the points I've brought up, and all you have are character attacks.

In your mind, your case is proved. In their minds, it is not. It is therefore undeniable that you have proven your case only in your own mind.

Until you can show where it's wrong, my points stand. That's how a debate works. And as you probably already know, the points I've brought up were taken before a panel that was unable to refute the points of law.