Ten courts have ruled that Obama is a natural born citizen. No Court has ruled that he is not a natural born citizen.
Barnett, Keyes v Obama (CA)
Rhodes v MacDonald (GA)
Ankeny v Daniels (IN)
Taitz v Obama [Quo Warranto] (DC)
Tisdale v Obama (VA)
Swensson, Powell, Farrar & Welden v Obama (GA)
Allen v Obama (AZ)
Pupura & Moran v Obama (NJ)
Voeltz v Obama [original jurisdiction] (FL)
Voeltz v Obama [reconsideration] (FL)
“Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.”-—Allen v Obama
Those are all lower cases but one thing is for sure:
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.
I already know that one of these citations is completely false. And I’m pretty the rest are being mischaracterized. Start with Ankeny v. Daniels. It did NOT rule that Obama is a natural-born citizen. The Allen v. Obama citation you posted RELIES on this decison, but there is absolutely NO LEGAL PRECEDENT in Ankeny to support the claim by this judge. It simply is NOT there.