I’m wondering what, exactly, she has found objectionable?
I agree with general notion that no one is above criticism. If Limbaugh says something I disagree with, he’s fair game just like anyone else. I’m just not sure what he’s said recently that would warrant Cupp’s proclamation? The Sandra Fluke thing blew up in his face last year, but that was short-lived and ultimately it was much ado about nothing.
This sounds an awful lot like a “I’m the *good* conservative who should keep getting work on MSM tv stations” bit of PR.
Beyond that...and I’m not saying this to be mean, but honestly, I don’t think Cupp is all that sharp. I don’t think she’s dumb, but I do think she has pretensions of being thought of as a super-brainiac type that aren’t in keeping with the quality of her contributions. Her delivery sometimes is not unlike Janeane Garofolo in that sense - trying just too hard to convince us all that she’s the smartest person in the room.
Just MHO, of course.
She couldn't cite a single thing (except maybe some reference to that pathetic 30-year old "Georgetown law student" who thinks taxpayers should fund her daily birth control supplies). Cupp doesn't listen to Rush. She's just another sellout scumbag who plays the token "conservative" for a paycheck from MSNBC.
The mistake was apologizing for calling the slut a slut.