To: Former Proud Canadian
It is my understanding ships were connecting with this ship to bring food and supplies. If food could be transferred, why couldn't passengers?
Perhaps you don't consider living in raw sewage an immediate danger but I do.
5 posted on
02/15/2013 4:28:29 AM PST by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
To: liberalh8ter
Maybe the supply ships were small and could only carry 50 to 100 passengers at a time. That would be 42 to 84 trips to get everybody off. Who goes first? Who decides who goes first? What if someone is injured or killed in the transfer at sea?
8 posted on
02/15/2013 5:06:18 AM PST by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
To: liberalh8ter
I don't think any deaths will result from this.
That said, I also think that the cruise lines treat their passengers like cattle. Their goal is to get them home alive. Food poisoning and engine failure are part of the deal, at times. I would NEVER take a cruise and put myself at the mercy of these guys.
10 posted on
02/15/2013 5:17:14 AM PST by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson